What role does the franchisor play in the sale of a franchise business?

When a franchisee is thinking about selling his company, it is advisable to first carefully study the franchise agreement. In many cases, the franchise agreement contains a provision relating to the sale of the company.

The agreement may include that the company must first be offered to, for example, the franchisor or the other franchisees of the organization. Only if they are not interested, or if no agreement is reached, is the franchisee free to offer the company to a third party in such a case.

Apart from the preliminary phase based on the franchise agreement, it should be noted that a third party is interested in taking over the company. Strictly speaking, the sale of the business is a process between the seller (franchisee) and the buyer. However, when a business is sold within a format, there is a third party to be considered in the sale, namely the franchisor. What is the role of the franchisor?

Assuming that the franchisee wants to sell the business under the franchise agreement, the seller will want to get rid of his obligations under the franchise agreement, while the buyer will want to become a franchisee. There are several ways to achieve this in practice. For example, the buyer can take over the current franchise agreement, the franchise agreement will be transferred with the sale. Another possibility is that the franchise agreement with the seller ends by mutual consent, after which the franchisor enters into a new franchise agreement with the buyer. Anyway; the franchisor will have to agree with the purchasing party.

Any withholding of the franchisor’s consent to the proposed transfer should be based on objective and reasonable criteria. If a buyer is not considered capable, and this can also be objectively substantiated, the franchisor is in principle not obliged to enter into a franchise relationship with the buyer. The company cannot then be sold ‘with formula’. The parties should be fully aware of this in a negotiation on the sale of a franchise company and, if necessary, include a reservation in the agreements to be made in order to obtain the franchisor’s consent.

However, the franchisor has no control over the agreements that the buyer and seller make, as long as the franchisor is not affected. In principle, therefore, the franchisor has no role in, for example, determining the price that the parties agree on or, for example, the delivery date, unless the franchisor has an interest to be respected in this regard.
The franchisor does have a responsibility towards the (potential) franchisee. For example, if the purchase price is so high that no return can be expected for the buyer, the franchisor should not enter into a franchise agreement with the buyer. Both the new franchisee and the franchisor benefit from a franchise company with a return that guarantees continuity.

The conclusion: when considering whether to buy or sell a franchise company, the franchisor and its interests should not be lost sight of during the negotiations and these interests may be a condition for reaching an effective agreement and the implementation of that agreement .

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017

On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the

By Alex Dolphijn|27-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Forecasts at startup franchise formula

The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the

Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?

On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation

Transfer customer data to franchisor

In its judgment of 10 January 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:68 (OnlineAccountants.nl), the Amsterdam Court ruled, among other things, on the question of how customer data should be transferred.

Franchise Closing Sale – Who Gets the Sale Proceeds?

The judgment of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands dated 12 October 2016, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:5061 (Administrator/Expert Group and Rabobank), focused on the question whether the franchisor, together with the bank,

By Alex Dolphijn|10-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Judge: franchisor’s duty of care comparable to that of a bank”

Various judgments in 2016 made it clear how high the standard of care for a franchisor towards its franchisees is.

Go to Top