Want to get rid of your franchise agreement in the meantime?
Franchise agreements are usually concluded for a longer period of time. Many franchisors also use a standard franchise agreement and it is often a considerable undertaking to adjust this standard in consultation with all franchisees. Such adjustments are periodically necessary in view of changing market conditions. All kinds of changes can also occur with individual franchisees. Interim changes can also lead to a franchisee wanting to get rid of the rest of the term of the franchise agreement.
How do you break open a franchise agreement? Most franchise agreements have a term agreed for a certain period of time and this term cannot usually be shortened in the interim without the franchisor’s consent. In a number of cases, however, the law does offer opportunities for the franchisee to terminate the franchise agreement prematurely. An important category of possibilities is the situation in which the franchisor has done something wrong, or is doing something wrong, as a result of which the unaltered continuation of the cooperation cannot be maintained. Not every franchisor error will allow the franchisee to complete the entire franchise agreement. The error must be sufficiently serious.
An illustrative case has arisen in this respect where the franchise agreement prescribed certain formalities to be observed in order to arrive at a certain change. For example, it was stipulated that the franchisees’ association had to be given the opportunity to give advice before the franchisor could make a certain change. Because the franchisor ignored this right to advice, the intended change could not be implemented, but there was no reason for the franchisee to disregard all obligations under the franchise agreement.
Breaking open a franchise agreement in the meantime does not always have to mean the end of the collaboration, but can also mean, for example, that parts of the franchise agreement are changed (for the individual franchisee).
In any case, it is certainly not always impossible to break open a franchise agreement. However, this is a legally thorny issue that requires proper guidance and advice.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to: dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Column Franchise + – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Towards strict liability”
The Supreme Court recently ruled in a prognosis issue.
Article in Entrance: “Rentals”
“The landlord increased the prices of the property every year, but he hasn't done this for 2 years, maybe he forgets. Can he still claim an overdue amount later?”
No valid appeal to non-compete clause in franchising
On 28 February 2017, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:1469, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Gelderland ruled on whether a franchisee could be bound by a non-compete clause.
Structurally unsound revenue forecasts from the franchisor
On 15 March 2017, the District Court of Limburg ruled in eight similar judgments (including ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2017:2344) on the franchise agreements of various franchisees of the P3 franchise formula.
Franchisee obliged to cooperate with formula change?
On 24 March 2017, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:1860, the preliminary relief judge of the Amsterdam District Court once again considered the issue in which Intertoys wishes to convert Bart Smit's stores
Delivery stop by franchisor not allowed
On 9 February 2017, the preliminary relief judge of the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:1372, ruled that a franchisor had not fulfilled its obligation to supply the franchisee