Want to get rid of your franchise agreement in the meantime?
Franchise agreements are usually concluded for a longer period of time. Many franchisors also use a standard franchise agreement and it is often a considerable undertaking to adjust this standard in consultation with all franchisees. Such adjustments are periodically necessary in view of changing market conditions. All kinds of changes can also occur with individual franchisees. Interim changes can also lead to a franchisee wanting to get rid of the rest of the term of the franchise agreement.
How do you break open a franchise agreement? Most franchise agreements have a term agreed for a certain period of time and this term cannot usually be shortened in the interim without the franchisor’s consent. In a number of cases, however, the law does offer opportunities for the franchisee to terminate the franchise agreement prematurely. An important category of possibilities is the situation in which the franchisor has done something wrong, or is doing something wrong, as a result of which the unaltered continuation of the cooperation cannot be maintained. Not every franchisor error will allow the franchisee to complete the entire franchise agreement. The error must be sufficiently serious.
An illustrative case has arisen in this respect where the franchise agreement prescribed certain formalities to be observed in order to arrive at a certain change. For example, it was stipulated that the franchisees’ association had to be given the opportunity to give advice before the franchisor could make a certain change. Because the franchisor ignored this right to advice, the intended change could not be implemented, but there was no reason for the franchisee to disregard all obligations under the franchise agreement.
Breaking open a franchise agreement in the meantime does not always have to mean the end of the collaboration, but can also mean, for example, that parts of the franchise agreement are changed (for the individual franchisee).
In any case, it is certainly not always impossible to break open a franchise agreement. However, this is a legally thorny issue that requires proper guidance and advice.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to: dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Ludwig & Van Dam attorneys summon Sandd and PostNL on behalf of the Sandd franchisees – dated 9 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) has today summoned Sandd and PostNL before the court in Arnhem. The VFS believes that Sandd and PostNL are letting the franchisees down hard.
Article The National Franchise Guide: “Why joint and several liability, for example, next to private?” – dated 7 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
Franchisees are often asked to co-sign the franchise agreement in addition to their franchise, for example. Sometimes franchisees refuse to do so and the franchise agreement is not signed.
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten assists Sandd franchisees: Franchisees Sandd challenge postal monopoly in court – dated 12 November 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) is challenging the decision of State Secretary Mona Keijzer to approve the postal merger between PostNL and Sandd before the court in Rotterdam.
Franchisee trapped by non-compete clause? – dated October 21, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of East Brabant has ruled that a franchisee was still bound by the non-competition clause in the event of premature termination of the franchise agreement.
Supermarket letter – 26
Supermarket Newsletter No. 26
Link franchise agreement and rental agreement uncertain? – dated October 14, 2019 – mr K. Bastiaans
It is no exception within a franchise relationship that the parties agree that the franchise agreement and the rental agreement are inextricably linked.