Vacancy: Lawyer employee and a Lawyer trainee

By Published On: 04-02-2021Categories: Statements & current affairs

Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten is a law firm that specializes entirely in franchise and other partnerships and is the market leader of its kind in the Netherlands. The office has extensive knowledge and experience and is characterized by a high level of thinking and working. Due to growth of the practice, we are looking for a:

Attorney-at-law

and a:

Lawyer trainee

Specific experience in the franchise practice is a plus.

We offer a working environment where you can work and develop in an excellent and relaxed collegial atmosphere. Some relevant work experience is desirable.

Information can be requested from Mr. Th.R. Ludwig, e-mail address: ludwig@ludwigvandam.nl or mw. mr. M. Munnik, e-mail address: munnik@ludwigvandam.nl , to whom the application letter can also be addressed.

You can also send your written application to the following address:

Ludwig & Van Dam Attorneys
Attn Mrs. mr. Munnik
Park avenue 44
3016 BC ROTTERDAM

Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to info@ludwigvandamadvocaten.nl

Other messages

Director’s liability of a franchisee after failing to rely on an unsound prognosis.

On 11 July 2017, the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch made a decision on whether the franchisor could successfully sue the director of a BV for non-compliance with the

Liability accountant for prepared prognosis?

In a judgment of the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch of 11 July 2017, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2017:3153, it was discussed that franchisees accused the franchisor's accountant of being liable

How far does the bank’s duty of care extend?

Some time ago the question was raised in case law what the position of the bank is in the triangular relationship franchisor – bank – franchisee.

Burden of proof reversal in forecasting as misleading advertising?

In an interlocutory judgment of 15 June 2017, the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant, ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2017:3833, ruled on a claim for (among other things) suspension of the non-compete clause.

Fine for franchisor because aspiring franchisee is foreigner

On 5 July 2017, the Council of State, ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:1815, decided whether, in the case of (proposed) cooperation between a franchisor and a prospective franchisee, the franchisor

Article in Entrance: “Company name”

“I came up with a wonderful name for my catering company and incurred the necessary costs for this. Now there is another entrepreneur who is going to use almost the same one. Is that allowed?"

By Alex Dolphijn|01-07-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |
Go to Top