Transfer customer data to franchisor
In its judgment of 10 January 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:68 (OnlineAccountants.nl), the Amsterdam Court ruled, among other things, on the question of how customer data should be transferred.
The franchise agreement stipulated that upon termination of the franchise agreement, the franchisee was entitled to continue serving (certain) customers. For those customers that would not be transferred from the franchisee to the franchisor, the franchisor would transfer all data related to those customers to the franchisee free of charge. This had to be done under penalty of a contractual penalty.
The franchisee is of the opinion that the franchisor had not complied with this obligation. The franchisor is therefore required to pay the contractual penalty. However, the court ruled that the franchisee had access to the relevant data in the cloud until one day after the franchise agreement had ended. The franchisee could download this customer data free of charge at any time. The franchisor is therefore not obliged to also make this customer data separately (physically) available to the franchisee.
According to the Court of Appeal, the franchisee cannot claim from the franchisor that which has already been made digitally available in the cloud by the franchisee itself.
mr. AW Dolphijn – Franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl .
Other messages
Happy New Year with no franchise agreement
“Happy New Year with No Franchise Agreement” On December ...
Dismantling of a franchise formula; franchisor Yarden again sanctioned with tenfold penalty payments
Franchisor Yarden continues to phase out the formula. It does ...
Imposing a formula change without a budget is not allowed
In a judgment of the District Court of Amsterdam, 2 ...
Ludwig & van Dam co-hosts webinar NFV Wet Franchise
Webinar 'Law Franchise' On October 28, 2022, Ludwig & ...
Can car dealers invoke the Franchise Act?
On 1 January 2021, the Franchise Act entered into ...
No formula change, but further development by the franchisor
The District Court of Maastricht ruled on 6 October 2022, ...