Transfer Arrangements in Master Franchise Agreements
Master franchise agreements are generally long-term: 20 or 25 years is no exception. Various subjects are regulated in a Master Franchise Agreement, such as the possibilities and restrictions under which the rights granted may be exploited as franchise rights, a target with regard to the branches to be opened and often (unilateral) conditions under which the Master Franchise Agreement may be terminated prematurely by the master franchisor. When the latter occurs, it is striking that most master franchise agreements usually do not include proper transfer arrangements with regard to the acquired rights.
As a result, master franchisor, master franchisee and the franchisees may be faced with abrupt and highly undesirable consequences. After all, if the master franchise agreement suddenly ends prematurely, the master franchisee’s authority to exploit the franchise rights (or have them exploited) will lapse. In other words, the franchise agreements concluded with the various franchisees are operated without right or title. It would seem obvious that a master franchise agreement would then contain an arrangement that the franchise rights are at least transferred to the master franchisor. However, most master franchise agreements do not contain such an arrangement at all. It is also important that, despite the premature termination of the master franchise agreement, the accrued franchise rights now represent a certain, often considerable value. If, in the event of premature termination, transfer would take place to, for example, the master franchiser, it is plausible to also include in the master franchise agreement that the corresponding value would accrue to the master franchisee. This is without prejudice, depending on the nature of the early termination of the master franchise agreement, to the possibility for the parties to claim damages from both sides and possibly offset this with the intended value. Such an arrangement is also generally absent in regular termination master franchise agreements. If the parties have not arranged anything in this regard, the master franchise rights can therefore be transferred to a subsequent master franchisee, without the remaining master franchisee being assured of cashing in the value of the built-up organization.
Parties are therefore advised to expressly arrange the aforementioned aspects in advance in their agreement when concluding a master franchise agreement. This provides clarity for the master franchisor, master franchisee and the franchisees and may prevent many (interim) problems.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Bankrupt because the franchisor refused to sell the franchise company – dated January 28, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of The Hague has dealt with a request from a franchisor to declare a franchisee bankrupt.
Prescribed shop fitting – dated January 28, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Midden-Nederland District Court has ruled on whether a franchisee is obliged to carry the shop fittings prescribed by the franchisor.
Ludwig & Van Dam attorneys summon Sandd and PostNL on behalf of the Sandd franchisees – dated 9 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) has today summoned Sandd and PostNL before the court in Arnhem. The VFS believes that Sandd and PostNL are letting the franchisees down hard.
Article The National Franchise Guide: “Why joint and several liability, for example, next to private?” – dated 7 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
Franchisees are often asked to co-sign the franchise agreement in addition to their franchise, for example. Sometimes franchisees refuse to do so and the franchise agreement is not signed.
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten assists Sandd franchisees: Franchisees Sandd challenge postal monopoly in court – dated 12 November 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) is challenging the decision of State Secretary Mona Keijzer to approve the postal merger between PostNL and Sandd before the court in Rotterdam.
Franchisee trapped by non-compete clause? – dated October 21, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of East Brabant has ruled that a franchisee was still bound by the non-competition clause in the event of premature termination of the franchise agreement.