Timely addressing parties in case of problems
What to do if you notice irregularities in your franchise relationship? It’s always a consideration. The forecasts provided by your franchisor prior to signing the franchise agreement cannot be met, and you will experience problems as a result. However, you also value a good relationship with your franchisor. This often also applies to any other trading relationships.
The advice is not to wait. Discuss problems, but also report problems in writing. If there is no solution, don’t wait. If you keep waiting to look for solutions to the problems that have arisen with your franchisor, or if you keep waiting to see whether a solution is actually found or offered, you run undesirable risks.
Not only does the risk exist that your problems will only get worse over time, but you also run the risk of forfeiting rights. If your problems have arisen due to the negligence of another person, then that other person should be informed and given the opportunity to improve, the legal term for this is a ‘default notice’. To demonstrate that this option is indeed offered, it is advisable to record this in writing. If a solution has not been realized or an agreement has not been fulfilled within a set reasonable period, it may be possible to enforce this in court. However, you cannot wait too long for this. There is then a risk that your claim will become time-barred, as a result of which any possibility of obtaining your right through the courts will be forfeited.
Of course you want to keep the relationships good, but that should also be possible without losing your rights, if only because you have always waited. In a good business relationship, written records can work very well. Every franchise relationship benefits from clarity, so that the views of the parties can be clearly assessed in the event of an unexpected assessment of a conflict by the court.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?
On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a
Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement
The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position
Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee
On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held
Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act
The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.
Does a franchisee have to accept a new model franchise agreement?
On 31 March 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2457, ruled in interlocutory proceedings on the question whether franchisor Bram Ladage had complied with the franchise agreement with its franchisee.
Mandatory (market-based) purchase prices for franchisees
To what extent can a franchisor change agreements about the (market) purchase prices of the goods that the franchisees are obliged to purchase?