The right of the franchisor to sell its franchise organization to a

Many franchise agreements include a provision stating that the franchisor reserves the right to transfer its franchise organization to a third party.
The question that then arises for many franchisees is whether this is possible without further ado. After all, they had emphatically concluded a franchise agreement with the relevant franchisor because of, among other things, the knowledge that the relevant franchisor has of the industry and the know-how present in the franchise organization. Although the latter is of course very understandable, a franchisor is allowed to include such a provision in the franchise agreement and then to implement it. It therefore regularly happens in practice that a franchisor wants to dispose of the entire organization – for very different reasons.

However, it is not the case that the franchisor is free to sell his business to any party. In the case of a sale of a franchise organization, the interests of the franchisees must prevail, which means that in the event of a transfer of the organization it must be ensured that the franchisees can continue their business in the same or in a very similar manner. on the terms agreed with the transferring franchisor. This applies in particular, of course, to the financial conditions on which the cooperation between the franchisor on the one hand and franchisees on the other is based. It cannot be the case that a transfer to a successive franchisor will result in the franchisees suffering a serious financial loss. The franchisee may in any case assume that during the term of the agreement, as he has concluded with the transferring franchisor, he can continue his business under the same conditions, irrespective of whether the franchise organization is transferred.

This is all the more pressing if the franchisee has made significant investments or has entered into financing obligations with lenders when entering into the franchise agreement – ​​as will be the case with most franchisees. It goes without saying that entering into such obligations is closely related to the conditions under which the franchise agreement has been entered into. The successive franchisor must also ensure that the market position of the company it takes over does not deteriorate. This is, of course, partly dependent on the question of whether a successive franchisor takes over the organization with the associated name and the like or whether it is placed under an existing franchise organization. This will be discussed in more detail in one of the following articles.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017

On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the

By Alex Dolphijn|27-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Forecasts at startup franchise formula

The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the

Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?

On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation

Transfer customer data to franchisor

In its judgment of 10 January 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:68 (OnlineAccountants.nl), the Amsterdam Court ruled, among other things, on the question of how customer data should be transferred.

Franchise Closing Sale – Who Gets the Sale Proceeds?

The judgment of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands dated 12 October 2016, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:5061 (Administrator/Expert Group and Rabobank), focused on the question whether the franchisor, together with the bank,

By Alex Dolphijn|10-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Judge: franchisor’s duty of care comparable to that of a bank”

Various judgments in 2016 made it clear how high the standard of care for a franchisor towards its franchisees is.

Go to Top