The right of the franchisor to sell its franchise organization to a

Following on from the article previously published in this series concerning the right of a franchisor to transfer his franchise organization to a third party, this will be further elaborated in the article below.

In practice, it often happens that a franchisor wishes to sell/transfer his franchise organization – often a part of a larger organization of the franchisor in question, which also includes other activities – for reasons of his own. As already outlined in the first article with regard to this subject, it is then of the utmost importance that this is done in joint consultation with the franchisees, whether or not they are represented in a franchise council / franchise association. After all, the success of a transfer to a third party of the organization largely depends on the contracting party of the franchisor, the franchisees. If these franchisees do not have confidence in a takeover candidate, it is wise for the franchisor to take this into account.

In practice, a transfer often means that the franchise organization is transferred to an already existing market party that often already operates in the same sector, but does not yet have a franchise organization and therefore wishes to expand its business operations in this way. It may also be the case that an existing franchise organization, whether or not operating in the same market as the franchise organization to be transferred, takes over the organization. In addition, a development can be observed in which the franchisees themselves take over the organization and thus become “their own franchisor”. Such a takeover by the franchisees themselves occurs in particular in situations where franchisees are en masse dissatisfied with the franchisor, or the franchise organization goes bankrupt or ceases its activities. If this is the case, it is of the utmost importance that the new franchise organization is organized in such a way that it is permissible under competition law. In short, this means that the organization must be sufficiently vertical. This will be discussed in more detail in a subsequent article. Finally, it should be noted that in all situations outlined above it is of the utmost importance that the succeeding party has sufficient knowledge of the market in which the franchise organization operates, as well as sufficient insight into the nature of cooperation on a franchise basis.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Post non-competition ban on services and sales franchise

When a franchise agreement ends, many franchisees encounter a prohibition in the franchise agreement to perform similar work for a period of time thereafter

The concept of the Franchise Act: impact for franchisors and franchisees – dated February 5, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin

Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten believes that if the draft of the Franchise Act actually becomes law, a lot will change for franchisors and franchisees.

Buy franchise business and the laid off sick employee from 7 years ago

The question is whether a Bruna franchisee, when selling the franchise company to Bruna, should have stated that seven years ago an employee had left employment sick.

Court prohibits Domino’s unilateral area reduction when extending franchise agreements – dated January 28, 2019 – mr. RCWL Albers

On January 9, 2019, the District Court of Rotterdam rendered a judgment in a lawsuit initiated by the Association of Domino's Pizza Franchisees and all its members (almost all Domino's franchisees).

By Remy Albers|28-01-2019|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Lien of the franchisee

Can a prospective franchisee invoke a right of retention to reclaim an entry fee if a franchise agreement is not concluded after the pre-agreement has been concluded?

Go to Top