The preliminary agreement
The European Code of Honor on Franchising has already been discussed in this series of articles. Article 3 of the European Code of Ethics deals quite extensively with the obligations a franchisor has with regard to the information he provides to so-called aspiring franchisees, ie before entering into a contract. This includes the manner in which a franchisor publishes (this must be unambiguous and not misleading) and provides information, including financial information, about the franchise organisation. The provision of information also includes the provision of the franchise agreement, a handbook, any (sub)lease agreement, as well as the provision of forecasts. In that context, it often happens that a franchisor decides to conclude a so-called pre-agreement with the prospective franchisee.
The main reason for a franchisor to do this is often due to the non-disclosure agreement that forms an important part of the pre-agreement. After all, if the data to which reference has just been made is provided, extremely sensitive information can be handed over, which must be prevented from (for example) reaching potential competitors. Such a preliminary agreement is also often used to insert a more or less “disguised probationary period” for the franchisee. Provided this is done in a clear and transparent manner, this can be an opportunity for both the franchisor and the franchisee to see whether the franchisee fits within the organization and whether independent entrepreneurship is also fully utilized. It should be clear that such a disguised probationary period is actually only possible and useful within a franchise organization in which the franchisee is not expected to make all kinds of far-reaching investments in advance that are necessary for the implementation of the franchiseeship. In other words, it only makes sense in principle for franchise organizations that have few initial investments or have a system in which those investments are first made when entering into the franchise agreement itself, to make use of a pre-agreement in such a way if desired. . Finally, it should be noted that a pre-agreement can also have the function of creating commitment on the part of the franchisee, as part of such a pre-agreement is often the payment of part of the entrance fee.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?
On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a
Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement
The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position
Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee
On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held
Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act
The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.
Does a franchisee have to accept a new model franchise agreement?
On 31 March 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2457, ruled in interlocutory proceedings on the question whether franchisor Bram Ladage had complied with the franchise agreement with its franchisee.
Mandatory (market-based) purchase prices for franchisees
To what extent can a franchisor change agreements about the (market) purchase prices of the goods that the franchisees are obliged to purchase?