Agreements Related to the Franchise Agreement
On 31 October 2017, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal issued similar judgments for nineteen franchisees (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9453 through ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9472).
On 31 October 2017, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal issued similar judgments for nineteen franchisees (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9453 through ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9472).
In a case before the Amsterdam Court of Appeal on 26 September 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:3900 (Seal & Go), a franchisee claimed compensation for goodwill (ex Article 7:308 of the Dutch Civil Code) after the
On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation
A judgment of 28 July 2016 by the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:6138, concerned the sale of shares in two companies in which an Albert Heijn supermarket
On 7 July 2015, the Court of Appeal in Den Bosch overturned a judgment of the District Court of Limburg on the concurrence of a franchise agreement and a sublease agreement.
Disclosure obligation versus obligation to investigate when purchasing a franchise company, Who bears the risk?
Eviction of the franchisee from the leased property in preliminary relief proceedings
In a judgment dated 18 November 2014, the Court of Appeal in Den Bosch considered, among other things, whether a lessor may terminate the lease of business premises due to urgent personal use.
On 15 July 2014, the District Court of Noord-Holland issued an interesting ruling in interlocutory proceedings about the competition of a supermarket by its own lessor.
An apparently remarkable outcome about a C1000 franchisee, of which the preliminary relief judge of the court in Amsterdam