On December 3, 2014, the District Court of the Northern Netherlands ruled on a dispute in which the attorneys of the Supermarkets section of Ludwig & Van Dam assisted a former C1000 entrepreneur
In an interim judgment dated 17 September 2014, the Amsterdam District Court considered the question whether the franchisee.
In a dispute about an appeal to an exoneration clause in the franchise agreement by the franchisor, it was considered that the nature of the franchise agreement should be taken into account
In a judgment of the Overijssel court of 9 April 2014, the interesting question arose whether a collaboration should be qualified as a franchise.
In a beautifully substantiated summary judgment of the Northern Netherlands Court of 9 April 2014, the question was whether an advance should be paid for the damage assessment procedure.
Error in prognosis - contrary to the expert report
The court recently rendered judgment between a franchisor and one of its franchisees.
On January 15, 2014, the District Court of the Northern Netherlands rendered an interesting judgment between Lilly's Ice Cream & Chocolate as franchisor and one of its franchisees.
The court in Utrecht has recently rendered a judgment with regard to a prognosis issue.
Franchisee successfully appeals for error as a result of a forecast provided by the franchisor