Formido franchisee stumbles over burden of proof in prognosis case
Formido franchisee stumbles over burden of proof in prognosis case
Formido franchisee stumbles over burden of proof in prognosis case
In a judgment of the Overijssel court of 9 April 2014, the interesting question arose whether a collaboration should be qualified as a franchise.
On January 15, 2014, the District Court of the Northern Netherlands rendered an interesting judgment between Lilly's Ice Cream & Chocolate as franchisor and one of its franchisees.
The court in Utrecht has recently rendered a judgment with regard to a prognosis issue.
Franchisee successfully appeals for error as a result of a forecast provided by the franchisor
The franchisee successfully appeals for error as a result of the forecast provided by the franchisor
Change in store franchisee's entrance to be regarded as a defect?
The Court of Haarlem recently ruled on a franchise issue in which prognosis problems were discussed.
The court in Arnhem has recently again ruled on so-called 'prognosis problems'.