The franchise statistics: save the date!
For many years, Ludwig & Van Dam franchise lawyers ...
For many years, Ludwig & Van Dam franchise lawyers ...
The Franchise Act entered into force on 1 January ...
On July 14, 2021, a legislative amendment to the shopping ...
The Eye Wish Opticiens franchisees have recently filed opposition to ...
On 7 February 2019, the District Court of Noord-Holland ruled on whether the municipality should allow a temporary Albert Heijn
On 6 September 2017, the Rotterdam District Court ruled, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:6975 (Misty / Bram Ladage), that the refusal to extend a franchise agreement by a franchisor
On 31 March 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2457, ruled in interlocutory proceedings on the question whether franchisor Bram Ladage had complied with the franchise agreement with its franchisee.
On 11 July 2017, the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch made a decision on whether the franchisor could successfully sue the director of a BV for non-compliance with the
In a judgment of the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch of 11 July 2017, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2017:3153, it was discussed that franchisees accused the franchisor's accountant of being liable
An apparently remarkable outcome about a C1000 franchisee, of which the preliminary relief judge of the court in Amsterdam