Interim termination (franchise) agreement
On 3 February last, the 's-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal ruled in a case that may also be relevant for franchise practice.
On 3 February last, the 's-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal ruled in a case that may also be relevant for franchise practice.
Disclosure obligation versus obligation to investigate when purchasing a franchise company, Who bears the risk?
Franchise agreements are usually concluded for a specific period of time.
Gathering factual evidence is sometimes one of the biggest challenges in litigation between a franchisee and a franchisor.
On November 11, 2014, the subdistrict court in The Hague ruled on whether an appeal to error in entering into a rental and dealer agreement was successful
Eviction of the franchisee from the leased property in preliminary relief proceedings
On December 3, 2014, the District Court of the Northern Netherlands ruled on a dispute in which the attorneys of the Supermarkets section of Ludwig & Van Dam assisted a former C1000 entrepreneur
The court in Assen recently ruled that a franchisor had wrongly suspended the deliveries of goods.
On November 12, 2014, the District Court of Rotterdam ruled in a case between the franchisor and the franchisee about the lawfulness of the termination of the franchise agreement.
The Court in preliminary relief proceedings has ruled on the question whether the C1000 franchisees have the right to know what agreements have been made about their fate.