Supreme Court on termination of franchise agreement
On 29 November 2024, the Supreme Court made a number ...
On 29 November 2024, the Supreme Court made a number ...
On 28 February 2023, the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch, ...
Termination of a franchise agreement in light of a substantial change in the leased retail space.
As a landlord, can the franchisor terminate the lease for urgent own use, in the sense of district protection, while this would be excluded on the basis of the franchise agreement.
In principle, franchise agreements can be terminated prematurely, for example by cancellation or dissolution. On 21 March 2018, the District Court of Overijssel ruled on ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2018:1335 on
Franchise agreements sometimes provide that the franchisee is required to sell back purchased assets at the end of the franchise agreement.
If the partnership between a franchisee and a franchisor ends, the question of who will continue to serve the customers may arise.
On 31 October 2017, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal issued similar judgments for nineteen franchisees (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9453 through ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9472).
In a case before the Amsterdam Court of Appeal on 26 September 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:3900 (Seal & Go), a franchisee claimed compensation for goodwill (ex Article 7:308 of the Dutch Civil Code) after the
On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation