Supermarket letter – 3

By Published On: 11-06-2013Categories: label11, SupermarketsTags:

                                                               SUPERMARKET NEWSLETTER NO. 3 

 

1. Infringement of the market territory by the own franchisor: overlapping exclusivity.

2. How independent is the supermarket entrepreneur still?

3. The lessor is also responsible for the immediate surroundings of the rented property.

4. New (improved) model rental agreement.

5. Jumbo continues with price comparison.

6. Payrolling; Will the real boss please stand up.

7. Unlawful competition from Makro-types?

8.Is a Pick-Up-Point a shop?

 

Click here for the entire article.

Other messages

Franchisor fails by invoking a non-compete clause

Although a non-compete clause is validly formulated in a franchise agreement, a situation may arise that is so diffuse that the franchisor cannot invoke it.

Acquisitions and Franchise Interest

It will not have escaped anyone's attention, certainly in the last year it can only be concluded that the Dutch economy is once again on the rise.

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal burden of proof in forecasts honored by court”

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+.

By Ludwig en van Dam|20-12-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Franchisor convicted under the Acquisition Fraud Act

For the first time, a court has ruled, with reference to the Acquisition Fraud Act, that if a franchisee claims that the franchisor has presented an unsatisfactory prognosis

Agreements Related to the Franchise Agreement

On 31 October 2017, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal issued similar judgments for nineteen franchisees (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9453 through ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9472).

Go to Top