Supermarket letter – 3

By Published On: 11-06-2013Categories: label11, SupermarketsTags:

                                                               SUPERMARKET NEWSLETTER NO. 3 

 

1. Infringement of the market territory by the own franchisor: overlapping exclusivity.

2. How independent is the supermarket entrepreneur still?

3. The lessor is also responsible for the immediate surroundings of the rented property.

4. New (improved) model rental agreement.

5. Jumbo continues with price comparison.

6. Payrolling; Will the real boss please stand up.

7. Unlawful competition from Makro-types?

8.Is a Pick-Up-Point a shop?

 

Click here for the entire article.

Other messages

No franchise agreement, despite the designation

Not everything is what it looks like. Even if the franchisor and franchisee believe that there is a franchise agreement, the legal situation may be different.

By Ludwig en van Dam|13-12-2018|Categories: Franchise Agreements, Franchise Knowledge Center / National Franchise and Formula Letter Publications|Tags: |

Compensation for reputational damage to the franchisor

A developer of a digital platform for a franchisor had provided a platform that any third party could access.

Sale of a franchise company due to a non-competition clause: False construction or not?

Franchisees who are unwilling or unable to continue with the franchise company experience whether or not the non-competition clause is valid or not.

Prohibited Franchise Agreements: Conduct of Franchisees Among Others

Forms of franchising that do not involve a vertical relationship between the franchisor on the one hand and the franchisees on the other may be prohibited.

A new franchisor against will and thanks

Mergers between franchise organizations are no longer an exception. Multivlaai/Limburgia, DA/DIO, Emté/Jumbo are recent examples of this.

Go to Top