It is impossible to imagine our society without the internet. The sale of products and services via the internet is also constantly increasing. It is therefore advisable to include provisions in franchise agreements that relate to e-commerce, for example. In this context, however, competition law regulations must be taken into account.
The general rule of competition law is that the franchisor is not permitted in franchise agreements to restrict sales by the franchisee, insofar as these restrictions relate to the territory in which or the customers to whom the franchisee may sell products or services.

However, there are four exceptions to this main rule. One of these exceptions is that the franchisor is permitted to limit active sales by franchisees to a specific exclusive territory. This implies that the franchisor may not impose any restrictions on the franchisee’s passive sales. And here lies the link with e-commerce. An example of active sales via the Internet is the sending of e-mail messages by the franchisee to (potential) customers on its own initiative. Passive selling is understood to mean the franchisee’s response to spontaneous requests from individual customers, including the provision by the franchisee of products and services to those customers. In general it can be said that the mere use of the internet cannot be regarded as a form of active selling. The consequence of this is that the franchisee must in principle be able to use the internet unimpeded to promote and/or sell products and/or services.

Is it then completely impossible for the franchisor to influence the passive e-commerce activities to be performed by the franchisee? The answer to this is negative. The franchisor is allowed to impose quality standards on the franchisee with regard to the use of a website. This could include (reasonable) requirements that the franchisor can set for the content and design (for example the use of certain colours) of the website to be used by the franchisee. So that both the franchisor and the franchisee know where they stand, it is important that the franchise contract (or the franchise handbook) sets out the rights and obligations of both the franchisor and the franchisee in the field of e-commerce, including the quality standards mentioned. , be clearly formulated.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal of burden of proof in forecasts approved by court” – February 2018

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam assists a franchisee in a

By Ludwig en van Dam|01-02-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Article Franchise & Law No. 7 – Franchise agreement as general terms and conditions

Uniformity of the franchise formula and (therefore also) uniformity of the agreements with the franchisees will often be of great importance to the franchisor.

By Alex Dolphijn|01-02-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

The franchisee’s customer base

If the partnership between a franchisee and a franchisor ends, the question of who will continue to serve the customers may arise.

The healthcare franchisor is not a healthcare provider

The Healthcare Quality, Complaints and Disputes Act (WKKGZ) creates the possibility of government measures being imposed on healthcare institutions to guarantee the required quality of healthcare.

The restructuring within the Intergamma formats from a legal perspective

The legal reality is sometimes more unruly than the factual. The controversial issue at Intergamma is a good example of this.

Go to Top