It is impossible to imagine our society without the internet. The sale of products and services via the internet is also constantly increasing. It is therefore advisable to include provisions in franchise agreements that relate to e-commerce, for example. In this context, however, competition law regulations must be taken into account.
The general rule of competition law is that the franchisor is not permitted in franchise agreements to restrict sales by the franchisee, insofar as these restrictions relate to the territory in which or the customers to whom the franchisee may sell products or services.

However, there are four exceptions to this main rule. One of these exceptions is that the franchisor is permitted to limit active sales by franchisees to a specific exclusive territory. This implies that the franchisor may not impose any restrictions on the franchisee’s passive sales. And here lies the link with e-commerce. An example of active sales via the Internet is the sending of e-mail messages by the franchisee to (potential) customers on its own initiative. Passive selling is understood to mean the franchisee’s response to spontaneous requests from individual customers, including the provision by the franchisee of products and services to those customers. In general it can be said that the mere use of the internet cannot be regarded as a form of active selling. The consequence of this is that the franchisee must in principle be able to use the internet unimpeded to promote and/or sell products and/or services.

Is it then completely impossible for the franchisor to influence the passive e-commerce activities to be performed by the franchisee? The answer to this is negative. The franchisor is allowed to impose quality standards on the franchisee with regard to the use of a website. This could include (reasonable) requirements that the franchisor can set for the content and design (for example the use of certain colours) of the website to be used by the franchisee. So that both the franchisor and the franchisee know where they stand, it is important that the franchise contract (or the franchise handbook) sets out the rights and obligations of both the franchisor and the franchisee in the field of e-commerce, including the quality standards mentioned. , be clearly formulated.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten will present “Onderneem ‘t!” on April 19, 2018 at the franchise fair. a seminar on: “Improving the legal position of franchisees? About trends and developments in legislation and regulations.”

For more information click on the link below.

Duty of care franchisor in the pre-contractual phase

The District Court of Limburg ruled on 6 April 2017, ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2016:2843, that the franchisor has a duty of care towards the prospective franchisee in the pre-contractual phase.

Franchisee avoids joint and several liability in private

In a judgment of 28 March 2018, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:2913, the District Court of Rotterdam ruled on the meaning of the clause in the franchise agreement stipulating that

Incorrect prognosis due to lack of location research

The District Court of The Hague ruled on 21 March 2018, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2018:3348, that a franchisor's forecast was unsound, as a result of which the franchisee had erred and the franchisor

Column Franchise+ – “Disputes about franchise fees”

Lately, it has also hit the biggest franchise organizations in the Netherlands. At the formulas of Albert Heijn, Hema, Etos, Bruna and Olympia, for example, there was and will be a lot

By Alex Dolphijn|09-04-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |
Go to Top