Relocation of franchisees
For a variety of reasons, it may be necessary for a franchisee to move their business to a different location during the term of their franchise agreement. This can be caused by problems concerning the rental relationship with the (main) lessor. This may also be prompted by economic motives, for example a changing, in particular deteriorating, market position of the existing business location. This has already been discussed in an earlier contribution to this section (business locations in motion), with an emphasis on the position of the lessor in this regard.
The question is also sometimes asked whether, when a franchisee moves, the existing franchise relationship in its entirety moves with it, as it were. However, it is lost sight of the fact that a new location, even if it is in the immediate vicinity of the old location, can still entail, and sometimes to a considerable extent, changed market conditions for the franchisee concerned. In practice, something similar can even occur when a franchisee moves within the same shopping centre. For example, the “loop” can turn out slightly different than was the case at the old location. The new location can also be arranged in such a way that an extra member of staff proves necessary to keep the relevant location running responsibly. In other words, a move can have significant consequences for the franchisee involved, both on the benefits and costs side. In the context of the foregoing, it is good franchisor practice, if possible, of course, to carry out a market and location survey of the new location in direct consultation with the franchisee concerned before the decision to move has been made. de facto in the same way as if it were a completely new franchise relationship.
In that case, any uncertainties regarding the new location can be adequately mapped out and both franchisor and franchisee can anticipate the new circumstances in a broad sense. It should be reiterated for the record that a franchisor, when approving the proposed move, bears a considerable responsibility in terms of its success, as the pre-eminently the one who is presumed to have the necessary knowledge and know-how to be able to assess whether the new business location fits within the franchise concept and can enable the franchisee to operate his business in a responsible manner. It is therefore in the interest of both parties involved to conduct a proper market and location survey in these types of situations.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017
On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the
Forecasts at startup franchise formula
The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the
Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?
On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation
Transfer customer data to franchisor
In its judgment of 10 January 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:68 (OnlineAccountants.nl), the Amsterdam Court ruled, among other things, on the question of how customer data should be transferred.
Franchise Closing Sale – Who Gets the Sale Proceeds?
The judgment of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands dated 12 October 2016, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:5061 (Administrator/Expert Group and Rabobank), focused on the question whether the franchisor, together with the bank,
Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Judge: franchisor’s duty of care comparable to that of a bank”
Various judgments in 2016 made it clear how high the standard of care for a franchisor towards its franchisees is.