Relocation of franchisees

For a variety of reasons, it may be necessary for a franchisee to move their business to a different location during the term of their franchise agreement. This can be caused by problems concerning the rental relationship with the (main) lessor. This may also be prompted by economic motives, for example a changing, in particular deteriorating, market position of the existing business location. This has already been discussed in an earlier contribution to this section (business locations in motion), with an emphasis on the position of the lessor in this regard.

The question is also sometimes asked whether, when a franchisee moves, the existing franchise relationship in its entirety moves with it, as it were. However, it is lost sight of the fact that a new location, even if it is in the immediate vicinity of the old location, can still entail, and sometimes to a considerable extent, changed market conditions for the franchisee concerned. In practice, something similar can even occur when a franchisee moves within the same shopping centre. For example, the “loop” can turn out slightly different than was the case at the old location. The new location can also be arranged in such a way that an extra member of staff proves necessary to keep the relevant location running responsibly. In other words, a move can have significant consequences for the franchisee involved, both on the benefits and costs side. In the context of the foregoing, it is good franchisor practice, if possible, of course, to carry out a market and location survey of the new location in direct consultation with the franchisee concerned before the decision to move has been made. de facto in the same way as if it were a completely new franchise relationship.

In that case, any uncertainties regarding the new location can be adequately mapped out and both franchisor and franchisee can anticipate the new circumstances in a broad sense. It should be reiterated for the record that a franchisor, when approving the proposed move, bears a considerable responsibility in terms of its success, as the pre-eminently the one who is presumed to have the necessary knowledge and know-how to be able to assess whether the new business location fits within the franchise concept and can enable the franchisee to operate his business in a responsible manner. It is therefore in the interest of both parties involved to conduct a proper market and location survey in these types of situations.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Alex Dolphijn in the Financial Dagblad about the judgment of the Supreme Court regarding Street-One

Franchisors more liable for incorrect forecasts Franchisees can now more easily hold their parent organization liable for incorrect profit and turnover forecasts.

Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Delivery stop by franchisor again not allowed”

Once again, the president in preliminary relief proceedings ruled on the question whether a franchisor's supply stop against the franchisee was permitted, with the franchisee paying a substantial

The manager (employee) who becomes a franchisee – fictitious employment?

On 14 December 2016, the subdistrict court judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2016:11031 (Employee/Espresso Lounge), considered the situation in which an employee

The Supreme Court sets strict requirements for franchise forecasts

A ruling by the Supreme Court on Friday casts a new light on the provision of profit and turnover forecasts to aspiring franchisees.

By Ludwig en van Dam|28-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |
Go to Top