Relocation of franchisees

For a variety of reasons, it may be necessary for a franchisee to move their business to a different location during the term of their franchise agreement. This can be caused by problems concerning the rental relationship with the (main) lessor. This may also be prompted by economic motives, for example a changing, in particular deteriorating, market position of the existing business location. This has already been discussed in an earlier contribution to this section (business locations in motion), with an emphasis on the position of the lessor in this regard.

The question is also sometimes asked whether, when a franchisee moves, the existing franchise relationship in its entirety moves with it, as it were. However, it is lost sight of the fact that a new location, even if it is in the immediate vicinity of the old location, can still entail, and sometimes to a considerable extent, changed market conditions for the franchisee concerned. In practice, something similar can even occur when a franchisee moves within the same shopping centre. For example, the “loop” can turn out slightly different than was the case at the old location. The new location can also be arranged in such a way that an extra member of staff proves necessary to keep the relevant location running responsibly. In other words, a move can have significant consequences for the franchisee involved, both on the benefits and costs side. In the context of the foregoing, it is good franchisor practice, if possible, of course, to carry out a market and location survey of the new location in direct consultation with the franchisee concerned before the decision to move has been made. de facto in the same way as if it were a completely new franchise relationship.

In that case, any uncertainties regarding the new location can be adequately mapped out and both franchisor and franchisee can anticipate the new circumstances in a broad sense. It should be reiterated for the record that a franchisor, when approving the proposed move, bears a considerable responsibility in terms of its success, as the pre-eminently the one who is presumed to have the necessary knowledge and know-how to be able to assess whether the new business location fits within the franchise concept and can enable the franchisee to operate his business in a responsible manner. It is therefore in the interest of both parties involved to conduct a proper market and location survey in these types of situations.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Post non-competition ban on services and sales franchise

When a franchise agreement ends, many franchisees encounter a prohibition in the franchise agreement to perform similar work for a period of time thereafter

The concept of the Franchise Act: impact for franchisors and franchisees – dated February 5, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin

Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten believes that if the draft of the Franchise Act actually becomes law, a lot will change for franchisors and franchisees.

Buy franchise business and the laid off sick employee from 7 years ago

The question is whether a Bruna franchisee, when selling the franchise company to Bruna, should have stated that seven years ago an employee had left employment sick.

Court prohibits Domino’s unilateral area reduction when extending franchise agreements – dated January 28, 2019 – mr. RCWL Albers

On January 9, 2019, the District Court of Rotterdam rendered a judgment in a lawsuit initiated by the Association of Domino's Pizza Franchisees and all its members (almost all Domino's franchisees).

By Remy Albers|28-01-2019|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Lien of the franchisee

Can a prospective franchisee invoke a right of retention to reclaim an entry fee if a franchise agreement is not concluded after the pre-agreement has been concluded?

Go to Top