Relocation of franchisees
For a variety of reasons, it may be necessary for a franchisee to move their business to a different location during the term of their franchise agreement. This can be caused by problems concerning the rental relationship with the (main) lessor. This may also be prompted by economic motives, for example a changing, in particular deteriorating, market position of the existing business location. This has already been discussed in an earlier contribution to this section (business locations in motion), with an emphasis on the position of the lessor in this regard.
The question is also sometimes asked whether, when a franchisee moves, the existing franchise relationship in its entirety moves with it, as it were. However, it is lost sight of the fact that a new location, even if it is in the immediate vicinity of the old location, can still entail, and sometimes to a considerable extent, changed market conditions for the franchisee concerned. In practice, something similar can even occur when a franchisee moves within the same shopping centre. For example, the “loop” can turn out slightly different than was the case at the old location. The new location can also be arranged in such a way that an extra member of staff proves necessary to keep the relevant location running responsibly. In other words, a move can have significant consequences for the franchisee involved, both on the benefits and costs side. In the context of the foregoing, it is good franchisor practice, if possible, of course, to carry out a market and location survey of the new location in direct consultation with the franchisee concerned before the decision to move has been made. de facto in the same way as if it were a completely new franchise relationship.
In that case, any uncertainties regarding the new location can be adequately mapped out and both franchisor and franchisee can anticipate the new circumstances in a broad sense. It should be reiterated for the record that a franchisor, when approving the proposed move, bears a considerable responsibility in terms of its success, as the pre-eminently the one who is presumed to have the necessary knowledge and know-how to be able to assess whether the new business location fits within the franchise concept and can enable the franchisee to operate his business in a responsible manner. It is therefore in the interest of both parties involved to conduct a proper market and location survey in these types of situations.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Termination of franchise agreement in case of changes in leased retail space – September 27, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
Termination of a franchise agreement in light of a substantial change in the leased retail space.
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “Distribution of (potential) customers prohibited?” – September 17, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
Within many franchise organizations, agreements are made about the recruitment of (potential) customers in a certain area.
District protection no protection against termination due to urgent own use – dated September 17, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
As a landlord, can the franchisor terminate the lease for urgent own use, in the sense of district protection, while this would be excluded on the basis of the franchise agreement.
Unreasonable compensation at the end of the franchise agreement – dated September 17, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
Some franchise agreements stipulate that the franchisee always owes the franchisor a minimum of a certain amount of costs upon termination of the franchise agreement.
Legal Franchise Statistics 2019: slight decrease in number of franchise disputes
In 2018, 44 judgments were published on Rechtspraak.nl, 12 of which were appeal cases and one in cassation (a prognosis issue against Albert Heijn).
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “Judge again rules in favor of Domino’s franchisees” – dated September 3, 2019 – mr. RCWL Albers
At the beginning of 2018, almost all franchisees of Domino's and the Association of Domino's Pizza Franchisees submitted two issues to the court in Rotterdam.