mr. Th.R. Ludwig gives a course for franchisees at the NFV
franchisor, franchisee, franchise contract
On Friday, April 11 at 11:30 a.m., Mr. Th.R. Ludwig a course for franchisees at the franchise fair in Hoevelaken. The course is organized in consultation with the Dutch Franchise Association. Various legal aspects will be discussed, such as the duration of the agreement, the relationship between the franchise agreement and internet sales, exclusive purchasing, non-compete clauses, sublease constructions, financial forecasts for the benefit of franchisees, the franchisor’s duty of care in this regard, et cetera. Registration can take place via the NFV.
Other messages
Article Mr. C. Damen – “When does the obligation to provide proof apply for the submission of the franchise agreement?” dated August 17, 2020
Does the obligation to produce information apply to showing a (franchise) agreement in proceedings if the parties to the proceedings do not have a legal relationship to the (franchise) agreement?
Article Mr. AW Dolphijn – “How do you value a franchise company with a discharge loan?” – dated August 14, 2020
A discharge loan is a proven means of franchisors to find long-term franchisees.
Article De Nationale Franchise Gids: “Information obligations of the intended franchisee under the Franchise Act” – dated August 7, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
Although the purpose of the Franchise Act is to protect franchisees against franchisors, a number of obligations have also been laid down for franchisees.
Legislative text of the Franchise Act – dated July 24, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The legal text of the Franchise Act was published in the Staatsblad on 1 July 2020. The full legal text reads as follows:
Law Franchise – dated July 23, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Franchise Act will have a considerable impact on both franchisors and franchisees.
Contractual dissolution requirements not observed? No legal dissolution of the franchise agreement – dated July 23, 2020 – mr. C. Damen
Can a franchisor terminate the franchise agreement if it has failed to comply with its own contractual requirements?