Ludwig & Van Dam in Distrifood about the future of independent supermarket entrepreneurs
However, many retailers are now at a loss due to ever-increasing costs and tight margins. However, that story has much less impact. The economic misery also means that many retailers have doubts about continuing. “You see that the model of the stores is under pressure at every supermarket chain,” says Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten to Distrifood. Dolphijn guides many supermarket entrepreneurs with legal matters and sees entrepreneurs struggling. ‘What you see is that the average age of entrepreneurs is quite high, while business succession within the family is not always obvious. At the same time, there are difficult market conditions. Entrepreneurs have to work hard and then they ask themselves: Do I still feel like doing this?’ Read the whole article here.
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Dissolution of the franchise agreement justifies dissolution of the related lease agreement
Dissolution of the franchise agreement justifies dissolution of the related lease agreement
Forecasts not achieved: franchisor liable. Remarkable?
The court recently rendered judgment between a franchisor and one of its franchisees.
Mistake and Void Franchise Agreement Based on False Forecast – Tort
On January 15, 2014, the District Court of the Northern Netherlands rendered an interesting judgment between Lilly's Ice Cream & Chocolate as franchisor and one of its franchisees.
Franchise contract not signed? Still bound…
Franchise contract not signed? Still bound...
Legal split at franchise and the bankruptcy pauliana
The Supreme Court recently made interesting rulings (ECLI:NL:HR:2013:2122 and ECLI:NL:HR:2013:2133 ) in a matter of legal unbundling, which is also important for the franchise practice.
The exclusive purchase clause before the court, competition
By judgment in summary proceedings of 26 November 2013, the preliminary relief judge of the District Court of Rotterdam