Franchising has enjoyed increasing interest in recent years. It has often been discussed: if the cooperation within the framework of a franchise formula works properly, then both the franchisor and its franchisees will benefit from that cooperation as a result of, among other things, an increase in scale, knowledge sharing and support and guidance with advice and guidance. deed. In practice, however, it often happens that a franchise formula is introduced in a sector that, by its very nature, is not particularly suitable for franchising.
Traditionally, franchise cooperation has been strongly represented in the retail sector and, for example, the fast food sector. Part of the concepts involved there usually consists of a strong sales formula and a fixed range, with clearly defined quality requirements. In other words, the concept and formula can be properly defined and described, so that all parties involved can clearly distill where they stand from the franchise agreement and the handbook.

Things are different with regard to some concepts and formulas. Without becoming too concrete, this may be the case, for example, with franchise formulas that focus exclusively on services. In such cases, the formula sometimes consists of no more than a protocol that must be applied by the franchisee concerned when providing its services. The service as such is entirely up to the franchisee himself and in such cases this often also applies to the services provided by the franchisee concerned. The question then is to what extent in such situations there is still an actual franchise formula that represents known and described know-how and against which a payment of franchise fee and the like can be justified. In practice, this sometimes leads to problems in such situations, in particular because the franchisees affiliated with such an organization at some point no longer recognize the added value of the organization and, as a result of their membership of that organization, only restrict their freedom. to feel.

The message of this contribution is therefore for potential franchisors to clearly ascertain in advance whether the franchise concept envisaged by the person concerned is suitable for franchising and whether the franchise organization actually offers added value to the affiliated franchisees. Before entering into a franchise agreement, the message for franchisees is to convince themselves that, as also formulated as a starting point in the European Code of Honor on Franchising, there is actually a proven formula for success.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?

On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a

Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement

The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position

By Jeroen Sterk|01-09-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee

On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held

Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act

The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.

By Ludwig en van Dam|10-08-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Does a franchisee have to accept a new model franchise agreement?

On 31 March 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2457, ruled in interlocutory proceedings on the question whether franchisor Bram Ladage had complied with the franchise agreement with its franchisee.

Mandatory (market-based) purchase prices for franchisees

To what extent can a franchisor change agreements about the (market) purchase prices of the goods that the franchisees are obliged to purchase?

Go to Top