Legal workshop Turnover forecasts at Ludwig & Van Dam
Legal workshop November 26
How do you ensure a prognosis that is claim-proof? Many franchise disputes revolve around issued sales forecasts. Recent rulings show a shift in forecasting issues to the detriment of franchisors.
Franchisors want to avoid lawsuits. A great deal of damage can be prevented by correctly responding to recent developments. This may require an update of your franchise agreement.
On Thursday 26 November we organize in collaboration with the Dutch Franchise Association the legal workshop Turnover Forecasts . In this interactive workshop, provisions related to forecasts in franchise agreements are discussed and tips are given on how to make a forecast claim-proof.
Program:
3:30 pm |
Reception |
4:00 pm – 6:00 pm |
Interactive workshop by: Jeroen Sterk and Alex Dolphijn, |
6 p.m |
Finally a drink and snack |
This workshop is intended for franchise formulas. This workshop is free for NFV members and non-members pay €150.00 excl. VAT.
You can register via the website of the NFV: http://www.nfv.nl/agenda/73/juridische-workshop-26-november/
Location
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys
River Street 159
3016 CH Rotterdam
![](https://ludwigvandam.megaconcept.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/232court-min-400x222.jpg)
Other messages
Chapter in book NFV about import and export of franchise formulas, written by mr. Th.R. Ludwig
Chapter in book NFV about import and export of franchise formulas, written by mr. Th.R. Ludwig
PVV motions to improve the position of franchisees
PVV motions to improve the position of franchisees
Changes at Albert Heijn’s hard franchise formula
Changes at Albert Heijn's 'hard franchise' formula
No mediation fee of one million guilders for the development of supermarket real estate
No mediation fee of one million guilders for the development of supermarket real estate
Supermarket letter – 7
Supermarket competed by its own landlord
Supermarket competed by its own landlord
On 15 July 2014, the District Court of Noord-Holland issued an interesting ruling in interlocutory proceedings about the competition of a supermarket by its own lessor.