Legal workshop Turnover forecasts at Ludwig & Van Dam

By Published On: 26-11-2015Categories: Statements & current affairs

Legal workshop November 26

How do you ensure a prognosis that is claim-proof? Many franchise disputes revolve around issued sales forecasts. Recent rulings show a shift in forecasting issues to the detriment of franchisors.

Franchisors want to avoid lawsuits. A great deal of damage can be prevented by correctly responding to recent developments. This may require an update of your franchise agreement. 

On Thursday 26 November we organize in collaboration with  the Dutch Franchise Association the legal workshop Turnover Forecasts . In this interactive workshop, provisions related to forecasts in franchise agreements are discussed and tips are given on how to make a forecast claim-proof.

Program:

3:30 pm

Reception

4:00 pm – 6:00 pm               

Interactive workshop by: Jeroen Sterk and Alex Dolphijn,
attorneys  at Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys 

6 p.m

Finally a drink and snack

This workshop is intended for franchise formulas. This workshop is free for NFV members and non-members pay €150.00 excl. VAT.

You can register via the website of the NFV: http://www.nfv.nl/agenda/73/juridische-workshop-26-november/

Location
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys

River Street 159

3016 CH Rotterdam

Other messages

Fine for franchisor because aspiring franchisee is foreigner

On 5 July 2017, the Council of State, ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:1815, decided whether, in the case of (proposed) cooperation between a franchisor and a prospective franchisee, the franchisor

Article in Entrance: “Company name”

“I came up with a wonderful name for my catering company and incurred the necessary costs for this. Now there is another entrepreneur who is going to use almost the same one. Is that allowed?"

By Alex Dolphijn|01-07-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Arbitration clause in franchise agreement sometimes inconvenient

On 20 July 2016, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2016:4868, ruled on the validity of an agreement in a franchise agreement, whereby disputes would be settled

By Alex Dolphijn|19-05-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |
Go to Top