Judge: Protect franchisee against supermarket organization (Coop) as lessor
Does the franchisee need legal protection from supermarket franchisor Coop? The District Court of Rotterdam ruled on 9 February 2018, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:1151, that this is the case.
In the event of (premature) termination of the franchise agreement, the rental agreement does not also end automatically. Franchisors often stipulate in their contracts with the franchisee that the duration of the franchise agreement and the lease agreement run synchronously. That provision is in principle invalid.
If a supermarket entrepreneur rents the business space from the franchisor, then the entrepreneur is very dependent on the franchisor. Fortunately, the law has rent protection rules. For example, if the franchise agreement ends, the rental agreement does not also end.
Together with a franchisee, Coop had asked the court for permission to link the duration of the franchise agreement to the duration of the rental agreement. The court makes it clear that the franchisee does not have such a social position compared to Coop. The franchisee requires legal rent protection towards Coop.
It is not the first time that if the franchise agreement ends, the supermarket entrepreneur can operate another formula, despite still renting from the old supermarket organization.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl .
Other messages
Article in Entrance: “New owner”
“The catering company where I work has been taken over. The new owner now says that I no longer have to work for him, but can he refuse me as an employee?”
Directors’ liability in the settlement of a franchise agreement
Privately, can the director of a franchisee legal entity be liable to the franchisor if the franchisee legal entity wrongfully fails to provide business to the franchisor?
Column Franchise + – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Towards strict liability”
The Supreme Court recently ruled in a prognosis issue.
Article in Entrance: “Rentals”
“The landlord increased the prices of the property every year, but he hasn't done this for 2 years, maybe he forgets. Can he still claim an overdue amount later?”
No valid appeal to non-compete clause in franchising
On 28 February 2017, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:1469, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Gelderland ruled on whether a franchisee could be bound by a non-compete clause.
Structurally unsound revenue forecasts from the franchisor
On 15 March 2017, the District Court of Limburg ruled in eight similar judgments (including ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2017:2344) on the franchise agreements of various franchisees of the P3 franchise formula.