Judge: Protect franchisee against supermarket organization (Coop) as lessor
Does the franchisee need legal protection from supermarket franchisor Coop? The District Court of Rotterdam ruled on 9 February 2018, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:1151, that this is the case.
In the event of (premature) termination of the franchise agreement, the rental agreement does not also end automatically. Franchisors often stipulate in their contracts with the franchisee that the duration of the franchise agreement and the lease agreement run synchronously. That provision is in principle invalid.
If a supermarket entrepreneur rents the business space from the franchisor, then the entrepreneur is very dependent on the franchisor. Fortunately, the law has rent protection rules. For example, if the franchise agreement ends, the rental agreement does not also end.
Together with a franchisee, Coop had asked the court for permission to link the duration of the franchise agreement to the duration of the rental agreement. The court makes it clear that the franchisee does not have such a social position compared to Coop. The franchisee requires legal rent protection towards Coop.
It is not the first time that if the franchise agreement ends, the supermarket entrepreneur can operate another formula, despite still renting from the old supermarket organization.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl .
Other messages
Structurally unsound revenue forecasts from the franchisor
On 15 March 2017, the District Court of Limburg ruled in eight similar judgments (including ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2017:2344) on the franchise agreements of various franchisees of the P3 franchise formula.
Franchisee obliged to cooperate with formula change?
On 24 March 2017, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:1860, the preliminary relief judge of the Amsterdam District Court once again considered the issue in which Intertoys wishes to convert Bart Smit's stores
Delivery stop by franchisor not allowed
On 9 February 2017, the preliminary relief judge of the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:1372, ruled that a franchisor had not fulfilled its obligation to supply the franchisee
Alex Dolphijn in the Financial Dagblad about the judgment of the Supreme Court regarding Street-One
Franchisors more liable for incorrect forecasts Franchisees can now more easily hold their parent organization liable for incorrect profit and turnover forecasts.
Supermarket letter – 17
Supreme Court: More quickly liable for forecasts
Article in Entrance: “Small print”
“When I do business with a supplier, I never read the fine print. Recently I noticed that there are all kinds of things in it that I actually do not agree with.