Judge: Protect franchisee against supermarket organization (Coop) as lessor
Does the franchisee need legal protection from supermarket franchisor Coop? The District Court of Rotterdam ruled on 9 February 2018, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:1151, that this is the case.
In the event of (premature) termination of the franchise agreement, the rental agreement does not also end automatically. Franchisors often stipulate in their contracts with the franchisee that the duration of the franchise agreement and the lease agreement run synchronously. That provision is in principle invalid.
If a supermarket entrepreneur rents the business space from the franchisor, then the entrepreneur is very dependent on the franchisor. Fortunately, the law has rent protection rules. For example, if the franchise agreement ends, the rental agreement does not also end.
Together with a franchisee, Coop had asked the court for permission to link the duration of the franchise agreement to the duration of the rental agreement. The court makes it clear that the franchisee does not have such a social position compared to Coop. The franchisee requires legal rent protection towards Coop.
It is not the first time that if the franchise agreement ends, the supermarket entrepreneur can operate another formula, despite still renting from the old supermarket organization.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl .
Other messages
Burden of proof reversal in forecasting as misleading advertising?
In an interlocutory judgment of 15 June 2017, the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant, ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2017:3833, ruled on a claim for (among other things) suspension of the non-compete clause.
Fine for franchisor because aspiring franchisee is foreigner
On 5 July 2017, the Council of State, ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:1815, decided whether, in the case of (proposed) cooperation between a franchisor and a prospective franchisee, the franchisor
Article in Entrance: “Company name”
“I came up with a wonderful name for my catering company and incurred the necessary costs for this. Now there is another entrepreneur who is going to use almost the same one. Is that allowed?"
The bank’s duty of care in franchise agreements
On 23 May 2017, the Court of Appeal in The Hague, EQLI:NL:GHDHA:2017:1368, had to rule on the question whether the bank should have warned a prospective franchisee in connection with the
Article in Entrance: “Standing up”
“Can I fire an employee with immediate effect if he steals something trivial, such as food that has passed its expiration date?”
Arbitration clause in franchise agreement sometimes inconvenient
On 20 July 2016, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2016:4868, ruled on the validity of an agreement in a franchise agreement, whereby disputes would be settled