Is it allowed to suspend payments?

Suspension is appropriate when a debtor (temporarily) postpones the fulfillment of his obligations because he has a counterclaim against his creditor, which his creditor still has to pay.

Suspension can take many forms, such as the garage owner who does not return a car to a customer after major maintenance because the bill has not been paid. However, it is most common for payment obligations to be suspended. For example, the franchisee who does not pay his franchise fee because the franchisor has not yet fulfilled certain agreements from the franchise agreement.

The question is whether suspension is allowed without further ado? The short answer is: no, you can’t just do that. Suspension of payments is only possible in special cases.
The right to suspend is regulated in article 6:52 of the Dutch Civil Code. This article contains a number of requirements that the suspension must meet, the most important of which are discussed here.

First of all, the person who wants to suspend his obligations must have a due and payable claim against his creditor and there must be sufficient cohesion between that claim and his own obligation. Coherence exists, for example, when the two obligations arise from the same agreement, such as, for example, from the franchise agreement on the basis of which the franchisee pays a fee to the franchisor and the franchisor provides a service to the franchisee.

Another important requirement is that the suspension must be ‘justified’. That means so much that suspension should only be allowed when it is reasonable and fair. Whether a suspension is reasonable and fair depends on the actual situation. In any case, do not suspend if the non-compliance by the franchisor is much smaller than the fulfillment of its own (financial) obligations.

In a franchise relationship, once the legal requirements have been met, and an injunction has been granted, you can state in a letter to your franchisor that you will not meet your obligations until the franchisor has fulfilled its obligations. The suspension is then a fact and ends when the franchisor has fulfilled its obligations.

In all this, it is good to realize what the consequences can be if you suspend unauthorized. If you invoke suspension, but it later turns out that this does not meet the requirements, you are committing a breach of contract with your franchisor. Always check whether the franchise agreement has not excluded an appeal to suspension. Always convince yourself that suspension is justified, so that you do not become liable for damages yourself!

Other messages

Obligation to sell back at the end of the franchise agreement

Franchise agreements sometimes provide that the franchisee is required to sell back purchased assets at the end of the franchise agreement.

Position of franchisees in franchisor restructuring

Franchisees must be adequately and generously informed in advance by the franchisor about the content and consequences of (further) agreements...

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal of burden of proof in forecasts approved by court” – February 2018

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam assists a franchisee in a

By Ludwig en van Dam|01-02-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Article Franchise & Law No. 7 – Franchise agreement as general terms and conditions

Uniformity of the franchise formula and (therefore also) uniformity of the agreements with the franchisees will often be of great importance to the franchisor.

By Alex Dolphijn|01-02-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

The franchisee’s customer base

If the partnership between a franchisee and a franchisor ends, the question of who will continue to serve the customers may arise.

Go to Top