Is it allowed to suspend payments?

Suspension is appropriate when a debtor (temporarily) postpones the fulfillment of his obligations because he has a counterclaim against his creditor, which his creditor still has to pay.

Suspension can take many forms, such as the garage owner who does not return a car to a customer after major maintenance because the bill has not been paid. However, it is most common for payment obligations to be suspended. For example, the franchisee who does not pay his franchise fee because the franchisor has not yet fulfilled certain agreements from the franchise agreement.

The question is whether suspension is allowed without further ado? The short answer is: no, you can’t just do that. Suspension of payments is only possible in special cases.
The right to suspend is regulated in article 6:52 of the Dutch Civil Code. This article contains a number of requirements that the suspension must meet, the most important of which are discussed here.

First of all, the person who wants to suspend his obligations must have a due and payable claim against his creditor and there must be sufficient cohesion between that claim and his own obligation. Coherence exists, for example, when the two obligations arise from the same agreement, such as, for example, from the franchise agreement on the basis of which the franchisee pays a fee to the franchisor and the franchisor provides a service to the franchisee.

Another important requirement is that the suspension must be ‘justified’. That means so much that suspension should only be allowed when it is reasonable and fair. Whether a suspension is reasonable and fair depends on the actual situation. In any case, do not suspend if the non-compliance by the franchisor is much smaller than the fulfillment of its own (financial) obligations.

In a franchise relationship, once the legal requirements have been met, and an injunction has been granted, you can state in a letter to your franchisor that you will not meet your obligations until the franchisor has fulfilled its obligations. The suspension is then a fact and ends when the franchisor has fulfilled its obligations.

In all this, it is good to realize what the consequences can be if you suspend unauthorized. If you invoke suspension, but it later turns out that this does not meet the requirements, you are committing a breach of contract with your franchisor. Always check whether the franchise agreement has not excluded an appeal to suspension. Always convince yourself that suspension is justified, so that you do not become liable for damages yourself!

Other messages

Prohibited Franchise Agreements: Conduct of Franchisees Among Others

Forms of franchising that do not involve a vertical relationship between the franchisor on the one hand and the franchisees on the other may be prohibited.

A new franchisor against will and thanks

Mergers between franchise organizations are no longer an exception. Multivlaai/Limburgia, DA/DIO, Emté/Jumbo are recent examples of this.

Supreme Court: Code of Honor regarding franchising has no legal effect – dated September 25, 2018 – mr. AW Dolphin

Supreme Court: Code of honor on franchising has no legal force

By Alex Dolphijn|25-09-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Franchisor wrongly hinders internet sales by franchisee – dated September 19, 2018 – mr. AW Dolphin

Franchisor wrongly hinders internet sales by franchisee

Go to Top