Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal burden of proof in forecasts honored by court”

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam represents a franchisee in legal proceedings in which the franchisor has been convicted for the first time under the Acquisition Fraud Act. The court states that the franchisor must be able to demonstrate afterwards that the prognosis is correct. The position of franchisees has been greatly strengthened by this ruling. To be able to prove that a franchisor has its affairs in order, the franchisor must come from a good family, explain franchise attorneys Jeroen Sterk and Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam.

Click here for the entire article. 

Other messages

Will the real competent judge please stand up!

Franchising, especially hard franchising, is increasingly a mixed legal relationship.

The early termination of the franchise agreement

Recently, on August 27, 2008, a court in preliminary relief proceedings ruled, among other things

Know-how and identity protection

One of the most essential parts of a franchise formula is

Internet sales in a franchise relationship

Internet sales are also enjoying increasing interest in conventional franchise circles.

Go to Top