Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal burden of proof in forecasts honored by court”
The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam represents a franchisee in legal proceedings in which the franchisor has been convicted for the first time under the Acquisition Fraud Act. The court states that the franchisor must be able to demonstrate afterwards that the prognosis is correct. The position of franchisees has been greatly strengthened by this ruling. To be able to prove that a franchisor has its affairs in order, the franchisor must come from a good family, explain franchise attorneys Jeroen Sterk and Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam.
![232court-min](https://www.ludwigvandam.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/232court-min.jpg)
Other messages
The bankrupt franchisor: set off claims under the franchise agreement against rents owed to the trustee
This section has previously written about “franchisor in difficulties” and in connection therewith
Well begun is half done: adequate link between franchise and sublease agreement
If you - in your capacity as franchisor - wish to expand your franchise formula
Duty of care in times of crisis
Duty of care in times of crisis
Monitoring and benchmarking
Monitoring and benchmarking
Presentation SME Netherlands
Presentation SME Netherlands
Presentation SME Netherlands benchmark systems
Presentation SME Netherlands benchmark systems