Incorporation of the franchisee’s business into a private limited company
When the franchisor and franchisee conclude their franchise agreement, in most cases the franchisees sign the franchise agreement in the capacity of private individuals. The starting franchisee then enjoys various tax benefits, such as the start-up deduction.
Over time, it sometimes happens that for tax and other reasons it can be interesting for the franchisee to place his activities in a private limited company. Does the franchisor have to cooperate in this?
It is of course primarily dependent on whether the parties have arranged something in this regard in the franchise agreement. If this is not the case, the franchisor and franchisee must consult properly. After all, due to the contribution to a private limited company, the franchisor suddenly has to deal with another contracting party. A good franchisor would be wise to cooperate with the transfer of the company (and the franchise agreement) into a private limited company by the franchisee, but will set reasonable conditions for this. These conditions may consist of the fact that the franchisee must, of course, remain the majority shareholder or sole shareholder. The articles of association of the private company must also be assessed. For example, it must be prevented that the private company can be used for debt dumping from a holding company located above the company. It is also important that the franchisee remains privately bound to the obligations under the franchise agreement vis-à-vis the franchisor. After all, the franchisee has also entered into obligations towards the franchisor as a private person. In doing so, one must again guard against the risks concerning the independence of the franchisee and a possible fictitious employment relationship. The franchisor is therefore well advised to coordinate this with the franchisee before actually establishing a private limited company. If this consultation takes place properly, it is very well possible to effectuate things without surprises afterwards.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017
On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the
Forecasts at startup franchise formula
The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the
Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?
On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation
Transfer customer data to franchisor
In its judgment of 10 January 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:68 (OnlineAccountants.nl), the Amsterdam Court ruled, among other things, on the question of how customer data should be transferred.
Franchise Closing Sale – Who Gets the Sale Proceeds?
The judgment of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands dated 12 October 2016, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:5061 (Administrator/Expert Group and Rabobank), focused on the question whether the franchisor, together with the bank,
Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Judge: franchisor’s duty of care comparable to that of a bank”
Various judgments in 2016 made it clear how high the standard of care for a franchisor towards its franchisees is.