Incorporation of the franchisee’s business into a private limited company
When the franchisor and franchisee conclude their franchise agreement, in most cases the franchisees sign the franchise agreement in the capacity of private individuals. The starting franchisee then enjoys various tax benefits, such as the start-up deduction.
Over time, it sometimes happens that for tax and other reasons it can be interesting for the franchisee to place his activities in a private limited company. Does the franchisor have to cooperate in this?
It is of course primarily dependent on whether the parties have arranged something in this regard in the franchise agreement. If this is not the case, the franchisor and franchisee must consult properly. After all, due to the contribution to a private limited company, the franchisor suddenly has to deal with another contracting party. A good franchisor would be wise to cooperate with the transfer of the company (and the franchise agreement) into a private limited company by the franchisee, but will set reasonable conditions for this. These conditions may consist of the fact that the franchisee must, of course, remain the majority shareholder or sole shareholder. The articles of association of the private company must also be assessed. For example, it must be prevented that the private company can be used for debt dumping from a holding company located above the company. It is also important that the franchisee remains privately bound to the obligations under the franchise agreement vis-à-vis the franchisor. After all, the franchisee has also entered into obligations towards the franchisor as a private person. In doing so, one must again guard against the risks concerning the independence of the franchisee and a possible fictitious employment relationship. The franchisor is therefore well advised to coordinate this with the franchisee before actually establishing a private limited company. If this consultation takes place properly, it is very well possible to effectuate things without surprises afterwards.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Bankrupt because the franchisor refused to sell the franchise company – dated January 28, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of The Hague has dealt with a request from a franchisor to declare a franchisee bankrupt.
Prescribed shop fitting – dated January 28, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Midden-Nederland District Court has ruled on whether a franchisee is obliged to carry the shop fittings prescribed by the franchisor.
Ludwig & Van Dam attorneys summon Sandd and PostNL on behalf of the Sandd franchisees – dated 9 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) has today summoned Sandd and PostNL before the court in Arnhem. The VFS believes that Sandd and PostNL are letting the franchisees down hard.
Article The National Franchise Guide: “Why joint and several liability, for example, next to private?” – dated 7 January 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
Franchisees are often asked to co-sign the franchise agreement in addition to their franchise, for example. Sometimes franchisees refuse to do so and the franchise agreement is not signed.
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten assists Sandd franchisees: Franchisees Sandd challenge postal monopoly in court – dated 12 November 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The Association of Franchisees of Sandd (VFS) is challenging the decision of State Secretary Mona Keijzer to approve the postal merger between PostNL and Sandd before the court in Rotterdam.
Franchisee trapped by non-compete clause? – dated October 21, 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The District Court of East Brabant has ruled that a franchisee was still bound by the non-competition clause in the event of premature termination of the franchise agreement.