Impact of Franchise Act on franchise statistics minimal
By Maaike Munnik and Remy Albers
Ludwig & Van Dam attorneys has been publishing periodic franchise statistics on franchise disputes since 2008, based on all published court rulings. On October 3, 2024, Ludwig & Van Dam attorneys presented its latest research at its event ‘ Franchise statistics current affairs and trends ‘. This research focused on the question of the impact of the new legislation (Franchise Act) on case law (rulings). It was concluded that the impact of the Franchise Act on case law is statistically minimal. However, the content of case law is increasingly colored by the new legislation.
Number of (published) judgments
In the context of the investigation into the franchise statistics, we asked ourselves whether this legislation would have an impact on the number of disputes that would be submitted to the court. This is not the case. Despite the introduction of the Franchise Act on 1 January 2021, we see a stable picture of around 30-35 rulings per year in the period around this introduction (2019-2024).
Table 1: Number of published judgments per year in the period 2008-2023
Every year, the most litigation concerns clauses in the franchise agreement (28%). The judge is also regularly asked for a ruling on conflicts about a typical franchise dispute, namely (incorrect) forecasts (15%). Since the implementation of the Franchise Act, there has also been an increase in disputes about the pre-contractual phase. In the past three years, the judge ruled on this seven times.
Franchise law
Despite the fact that the Franchise Act does not seem to have any impact on the franchise statistics in terms of numbers, a trend can be observed in which the Franchise Act is increasingly part of legal proceedings. The turning point can be observed in 2023 and in 2024, more rulings have been published to date in which the Franchise Act was discussed than not. The fact that this trend is only visible two years after the introduction of the Franchise Act seems to be a logical consequence of the (long) duration of legal proceedings.
Table 2: number of rulings in which the Franchise Act was or was not invoked (up to and including 3 October 2024)
Who Wins?
The question that naturally occupies everyone in the context of the Franchise Act is whether the Franchise Act has an impact on the outcome of the procedure. Does a franchisee win more often when he invokes the Franchise Act? Over the period from 2008 to mid-2024, there is an equal distribution of profits for a franchisor (47%) and franchisee (46%). In 7% of cases, the franchisor and franchisee share the profits. In the years 2019, 2020 and 2021 (before the impact of the Franchise Act is visible in the case law), we see that the franchisor wins predominantly more cases than the franchisee, but that this difference is limited. In the years 2022, 2023 and 2024, there is a change in which the franchisee wins predominantly more cases than the franchisor, but this difference is also limited. The impact of the Franchise Act is therefore minimal, but visible.
Subject
Specifically with regard to the procedures that are conducted in which use is made of the Franchise Act, we note that proceedings are mainly conducted about the non-competition clause and the standstill period (pre-contractual phase). We see that the judge applies the standstill period (and therefore the four-week period) strictly. Various procedures have also been conducted about good franchisorship, which open standard apparently offers a lower threshold for condemning the franchisor compared to the general standard from the law: reasonableness and fairness.
Conclusion
Since the implementation of the Franchise Act, we have not seen any (substantial) changes in the franchise statistics. However, (logically) the Franchise Act is increasingly being invoked by (particularly) franchisees. Based on the figures, franchisees seem to be getting a little support. However, the figures are not convincing enough to conclude that franchisees win more cases as a result of the Franchise Act. The content of the case law is now being coloured by the Franchise Act. As a result, we see in particular that franchisees regularly invoke their rights in the context of the pre-contractual phase.
Do you have any questions about the franchise statistics? Please feel free to contact our office.
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to albers@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Forced to switch to a different franchise formula at the existing location?
If a franchise formula ceases to exist, for example if it is incorporated into another organization, the question may be whether the franchisee is also obliged to be incorporated into
Column Franchise+ – 50 percent more franchise lawsuits
The 2018 Legal Franchise Statistics published by Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten shows that there has been a 50% increase in the number of judgments in court cases rendered in 2017 compared to
A closer look at the intention to introduce franchising legislation
On May 23rd, State Secretary Mona Keijzer informed the House of Representatives about the imminent franchise legislation. The National Franchise Guide previously published this article.
Consumer Protection Applies to Franchisee
The consumer enjoys broad protection on the basis of the Civil Code.
Update Franchise Law
On 23 May 2018, the government indicated that it would prepare a legal regulation that creates a framework for four sub-areas of cooperation between franchisors and franchisees that are crucial
On the edge of a franchisee’s exclusive territory
The Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden ruled on 15 May 2018, ECLI:NL:GHARL:2018:4395, on the question whether a franchisor has a branch just over the edge of the exclusively granted protection area.