If your franchisor is your competitor
Franchising aims at cooperation. The franchisor should assist the franchisee in achieving mutual benefit from the operation of the formula. Sometimes this gets out of balance. What if the franchisor starts to compete with the franchisee?
In principle, a franchisor is not allowed to compete with its own franchisees. After all, that is contrary to the idea behind the franchise cooperation. Competition from your own franchisor is not always obvious.
Competition by the franchisor can take several forms. It is obvious to establish a branch in the franchisee’s market area. There is also the possibility of facilitating the arrival of someone else who is competitive. For example, the franchisor may rent a retail space to a third party who is a competitor of the nearby franchisee.
What often happens is that the franchisor reserves the right to be the only one to have a web shop, while the franchisees are obliged to promote the web shop. If the franchisee does not share in the revenues, this can also be unlawful.
It also happens that the same franchisor starts a second formula that is competitive. It is then bitter if the franchisor puts all his energy into this second formula and uses the fees paid by the franchisees of the first formula. The franchisor may also not trade the core range that the franchisees have co-developed and which has been sold to the format.
Franchisees must be alert to competition from their own franchisor and, where necessary, appeal against injustice.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Franchisor is obliged to extend the franchise agreement
On 6 September 2017, the Rotterdam District Court ruled, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:6975 (Misty / Bram Ladage), that the refusal to extend a franchise agreement by a franchisor
The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?
On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a
Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement
The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position
Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee
On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held
Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act
The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.
Does a franchisee have to accept a new model franchise agreement?
On 31 March 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2457, ruled in interlocutory proceedings on the question whether franchisor Bram Ladage had complied with the franchise agreement with its franchisee.