If your franchisor is your competitor
Franchising aims at cooperation. The franchisor should assist the franchisee in achieving mutual benefit from the operation of the formula. Sometimes this gets out of balance. What if the franchisor starts to compete with the franchisee?
In principle, a franchisor is not allowed to compete with its own franchisees. After all, that is contrary to the idea behind the franchise cooperation. Competition from your own franchisor is not always obvious.
Competition by the franchisor can take several forms. It is obvious to establish a branch in the franchisee’s market area. There is also the possibility of facilitating the arrival of someone else who is competitive. For example, the franchisor may rent a retail space to a third party who is a competitor of the nearby franchisee.
What often happens is that the franchisor reserves the right to be the only one to have a web shop, while the franchisees are obliged to promote the web shop. If the franchisee does not share in the revenues, this can also be unlawful.
It also happens that the same franchisor starts a second formula that is competitive. It is then bitter if the franchisor puts all his energy into this second formula and uses the fees paid by the franchisees of the first formula. The franchisor may also not trade the core range that the franchisees have co-developed and which has been sold to the format.
Franchisees must be alert to competition from their own franchisor and, where necessary, appeal against injustice.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Judge: Protect franchisee against supermarket organization (Coop) as lessor
Does the franchisee need legal protection from supermarket franchisor Coop? The District Court of Rotterdam ruled on 9 February 2018, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:1151, that this is the case.
Acquisition fraud vs. error in franchise forecasting
Who has to prove that the franchisor's forecast is unsound? In principle, this is the franchisee. If the franchisee invokes the Acquisition Fraud Act, it may be that
Obligation to sell back at the end of the franchise agreement
Franchise agreements sometimes provide that the franchisee is required to sell back purchased assets at the end of the franchise agreement.
Supermarket letter – 20
Uncertain legal position of Emté franchisees
Position of franchisees in franchisor restructuring
Franchisees must be adequately and generously informed in advance by the franchisor about the content and consequences of (further) agreements...
Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal of burden of proof in forecasts approved by court” – February 2018
The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam assists a franchisee in a