Goodwill Transfer: Include Google Business Profile?
What is transferred goodwill? This question can be very relevant in franchise relationships where goodwill is important (Section 7:921 of the Dutch Civil Code). Does Goodwill Transfer include a Google Business Profile? On 21 June 2022, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2022:5363, made an important ruling in that context.
The issue was that since the start in 2005, a nationwide franchise organization had been built up from one restaurant in Rotterdam. As a result, the brand name has gained enormous fame.
In 2018, a certain restaurant of that chain was sold. The buyer does not become a franchisee. The brand name of the restaurant is not transferred to the buyer and remains with the seller. The buyer has also started the rebranding and this will be completed in mid-April 2021.
A Google business profile has been created by the seller in the past for the restaurant. The brand name of the franchise chain is central to this. A Google company profile is a tool that companies can use to increase their online findability via Google.
Due to the restaurant rebranding, the restaurateur has changed the content of the Google business profile. He then found that he was only registered as an administrator. As it turned out, the main owner was (still) the party that had sold the restaurant at the time.
The seller is required to change the Google Business Profile and register the buyer as the primary owner of the Google Business Profile. The buyer states that the Google company profile was the subject of the purchase agreement concluded. This would appear from the fact that € 200,000 was paid for transferred goodwill. However, the seller points out that the purchase agreement stipulates that the sale does not include the right to use or ownership of the brand name, which name is reflected in the Google company profile. The claim is therefore rejected by the court, as it has not become apparent that the buyer has any claim to the Google company profile. After all, the purchase agreement does not mention this.
In franchising relationships, it is very important for business transfer to have agreements about who is entitled to, for example, a Google company profile, but also (other) social media accounts, such as LinkedIn, Facebook or Instagtam. This can be arranged in the purchase agreement during the transfer, but it may be even better to (also) lay this down in the franchise agreement in advance.
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Legal Franchise Statistics 2019: slight decrease in number of franchise disputes
In 2018, 44 judgments were published on Rechtspraak.nl, 12 of which were appeal cases and one in cassation (a prognosis issue against Albert Heijn).
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “Judge again rules in favor of Domino’s franchisees” – dated September 3, 2019 – mr. RCWL Albers
At the beginning of 2018, almost all franchisees of Domino's and the Association of Domino's Pizza Franchisees submitted two issues to the court in Rotterdam.
Article De Nationale Franchisegids: “The interim termination of the franchise agreement” – August 12, 2019 – mr. JAJ Devilee
A franchise agreement can end prematurely in many ways.
Article De Nationale Franchise Gids: “Parliamentary questions asked about (false) self-employment franchisees” – dated 24 July 2019 – mr. M. Munnik
Parliamentary questions have recently been asked about the so-called bogus self-employment within the relationship between franchisor and franchisee.
Article Franchise+: “With our franchise formula you will earn mountains of gold.” dated 10 July 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
The distinction between permissible promotions and misleading information remains a gray area, despite the relevant legislation.
Franchisee may purchase a range of foreign products after mandatory formula change – June 6, 2019 – mr. JAJ Devilee
The District Court of East Brabant recently dealt with an important matter in preliminary relief proceedings in which a franchisee was completely involuntarily forced to adopt an alternative formula.