In a case before the Amsterdam Court of Appeal on 26 September 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:3900 (Seal & Go), a franchisee claimed goodwill compensation (ex Article 7:308 of the Dutch Civil Code) after the franchisor had terminated the lease, in order to continue the operation of the company itself. 

In the first instance, the District Court of Noord-Holland dated 24 December 2015, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2015:11974, rejected the franchisee’s claim because there was no advantage on the part of the franchisor. The clientele was due to the location and not the entrepreneurial activity. The company was located at Schiphol Airport and it is that location that apparently, according to the court, resulted in the (accumulated) customer base. 

The Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s judgment and added that the mere significant increase in turnover and profit realized by the former franchisee does not provide sufficient concrete leads to conclude that the franchisor has enjoyed an attributable advantage. to the franchisee’s business activities. 

mr. AW Dolphijn – Franchise lawyer 

Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl .

Other messages

Know-how and identity protection

One of the most essential parts of a franchise formula is

Internet sales in a franchise relationship

Internet sales are also enjoying increasing interest in conventional franchise circles.

What role does the franchisor play in the sale of a franchise business?

When a franchisee is thinking about selling his business, it is advisable

By Ludwig en van Dam|01-01-2000|Categories: Franchise Agreements, Franchise Knowledge Center / National Franchise and Formula Letter Publications|Tags: |

Franchisor in trouble, what to do?

It seems inevitable that the world is heading for a recession.

Go to Top