From manager to franchisee
It regularly happens that branch managers are invited to franchise the branch where they work. This offers opportunities, but can also entail all kinds of unforeseen risks due to the transition.
Labor law first and foremost requires that the employment contract be terminated in a careful manner. According to case law, the employer/prospective franchisor must carefully investigate whether the company manager is sufficiently informed and actually wants to give up his protection under employment law and social insurance law. It is recommended that this voluntary choice and the process leading up to it also be recorded in writing. It is also important to take plenty of time for this. In addition, self-employment should not be anticipated before all agreements have been signed.
The (additional) due care to be observed is partly due to the fact that the employee is generally in a dependent position vis-à-vis the employer/franchisor. If this process is not supervised with sufficient care, there is a risk that the termination of the employment contract may subsequently be regarded as invalid due to the lack of a will aimed at actual self-employment and/or abuse of circumstances. The employee must therefore not be lightly “tempted” into self-employment.
Also, after the choice for self-employment, something actually needs to change in the relationship. In the event of such a transition, it will have to be critically examined whether the tax authorities and the UWV have indeed started to regard the former employee as a self-employed person. To this end, it is important that the case is submitted to the aforementioned authorities in advance and that a VAR statement (WUO) is requested in good time.
Particular attention is also required when providing, or withholding, any forecasts. In some cases, forecasts are omitted on the assumption that the manager is well informed. However, that need not always be the case. After all, the question arises whether the manager has had insight into cost structures in a franchise relationship. It is therefore recommended to state explicitly why forecasts are not made. By acting in this way, the requirement of informed consent, which should be the basis for termination of the employment contract, will also be met more quickly.
This can lay the foundation for a successful franchise relationship, which will be experienced as a promotion.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
Article in Entrance: “New owner”
“The catering company where I work has been taken over. The new owner now says that I no longer have to work for him, but can he refuse me as an employee?”
Directors’ liability in the settlement of a franchise agreement
Privately, can the director of a franchisee legal entity be liable to the franchisor if the franchisee legal entity wrongfully fails to provide business to the franchisor?
Column Franchise + – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Towards strict liability”
The Supreme Court recently ruled in a prognosis issue.
Article in Entrance: “Rentals”
“The landlord increased the prices of the property every year, but he hasn't done this for 2 years, maybe he forgets. Can he still claim an overdue amount later?”
No valid appeal to non-compete clause in franchising
On 28 February 2017, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:1469, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Gelderland ruled on whether a franchisee could be bound by a non-compete clause.
Structurally unsound revenue forecasts from the franchisor
On 15 March 2017, the District Court of Limburg ruled in eight similar judgments (including ECLI:NL:RBLIM:2017:2344) on the franchise agreements of various franchisees of the P3 franchise formula.