From manager to franchisee
It regularly happens that branch managers are invited to franchise the branch where they work. This offers opportunities, but can also entail all kinds of unforeseen risks due to the transition.
Labor law first and foremost requires that the employment contract be terminated in a careful manner. According to case law, the employer/prospective franchisor must carefully investigate whether the company manager is sufficiently informed and actually wants to give up his protection under employment law and social insurance law. It is recommended that this voluntary choice and the process leading up to it also be recorded in writing. It is also important to take plenty of time for this. In addition, self-employment should not be anticipated before all agreements have been signed.
The (additional) due care to be observed is partly due to the fact that the employee is generally in a dependent position vis-à-vis the employer/franchisor. If this process is not supervised with sufficient care, there is a risk that the termination of the employment contract may subsequently be regarded as invalid due to the lack of a will aimed at actual self-employment and/or abuse of circumstances. The employee must therefore not be lightly “tempted” into self-employment.
Also, after the choice for self-employment, something actually needs to change in the relationship. In the event of such a transition, it will have to be critically examined whether the tax authorities and the UWV have indeed started to regard the former employee as a self-employed person. To this end, it is important that the case is submitted to the aforementioned authorities in advance and that a VAR statement (WUO) is requested in good time.
Particular attention is also required when providing, or withholding, any forecasts. In some cases, forecasts are omitted on the assumption that the manager is well informed. However, that need not always be the case. After all, the question arises whether the manager has had insight into cost structures in a franchise relationship. It is therefore recommended to state explicitly why forecasts are not made. By acting in this way, the requirement of informed consent, which should be the basis for termination of the employment contract, will also be met more quickly.
This can lay the foundation for a successful franchise relationship, which will be experienced as a promotion.
Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice
Other messages
The benchmark for franchise forecasts – dated 29 May 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
On 19 March 2019, the Den Bosch Court of Appeal, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2019:1037, listed the case law of the Supreme Court on prognosis in franchising.
Franchise arbitration: too high a threshold? – mr. M. Munnik
When entering into an agreement, it is possible for the parties - contrary to the law - to designate a competent court. This also applies to the franchise agreement. Of this possibility
Franchise appeal for error due to incorrect forecasts and lack of support rejected – dated April 25, 2019 – mr. K. Bastian
The Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch ruled (ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2019:697) on the question whether the mere fact that forecasts did not materialize justifies the conclusion that the franchisee has been shortchanged...
Article De Nationale Franchise Gids: “Increasing protection against recruiting franchisees” – dated 2 April 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin
It is becoming increasingly apparent that recruited franchisees can be protected on the basis of the Acquisition Fraud Act.
The Franchise Association and Franchise Binding – Contracting 2019, No. 1
A contribution on common provisions in franchise agreements that require a franchisee to be a member of a franchisee's association.
Deception in recruiting a franchisee?
A ruling on whether the franchisor had made a misrepresentation when recruiting a franchisee.