Franchisor liable for forecasts from third parties – dated March 6, 2019 – mr. M. Munnik

According to established case law, a franchisor acts unlawfully towards its franchisee when a franchisor independently conducts research in a careless manner and, as a result, provides incorrect revenue forecasts to the franchisee. If, on the basis of correct turnover forecasts, the franchisee would not have concluded the franchise agreement or would not have concluded it under the same conditions, the franchisee can also invoke error.

To limit this risk, more and more franchisors are opting to outsource the preparation of a forecast to a third party. After all, as long as the franchisor is not aware of errors in the forecast drawn up by a third party, he is in principle not liable for this. However, the East Brabant District Court recently ruled that the franchisor is not automatically immune from liability in that case either.

In the dispute in question, an expert has been engaged to draw up turnover forecasts for a flan shop. The franchisor provides an expert with crucial data for the purposes of the forecasts: he expects 300 pies to be sold per week at a certain price in the first year. In addition, data was provided from three other branches. Based on this, the expert has drawn up turnover forecasts for the first three years.

In retrospect, it appears that the three branches were not representative of the operation of this franchise branch and that sales of 300 pies per week were nowhere near achieved. However, the franchisor takes the position that it is not responsible for the turnover forecasts issued because it has not drawn them up. The court does not agree.

The court ruled that although the franchisor did not state detailed turnover amounts, it did provide all the information necessary to calculate the turnover amounts in a simple manner. The court qualifies the information as a turnover forecast of the franchisor. According to the court, the fact that the parties differ on the question of who the client was is not an issue here.

Although the preparation of forecasts is often outsourced to third parties, in practice fundamental information is often still provided on the basis of which the turnover forecasts are calculated. The above ruling makes it clear that in that case a franchisor cannot simply shift its responsibility to a third party.

In short, a franchisor must also act with due care when providing information to a third party for the purpose of making a forecast.

 

mr. M. Munnik – franchise lawyer

Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice.

Do you want to respond? Go to munnik@ludwigvandam.nl

Other messages

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal burden of proof in forecasts honored by court”

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+.

By Ludwig en van Dam|20-12-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Franchisor convicted under the Acquisition Fraud Act

For the first time, a court has ruled, with reference to the Acquisition Fraud Act, that if a franchisee claims that the franchisor has presented an unsatisfactory prognosis

Agreements Related to the Franchise Agreement

On 31 October 2017, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal issued similar judgments for nineteen franchisees (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9453 through ECLI:NL:GHARL:2017:9472).

Column Franchise+ – mr. J. Sterk – “Franchisee does body check better than franchise check”

A gym embarks on a franchise concept that offers “Body Checks” and discounts to (potential) members in collaboration with health insurers.

Seminar Mrs. J. Sterk and M. Munnik – Thursday, November 2, 2017: “Important legal developments for franchisors”

Attorneys Jeroen Sterk and Maaike Munnik of Ludwig & Van Dam Advocaten will update you on the status of and developments surrounding the Dutch Franchise Code and the Acquisition Fraude Act.

By Jeroen Sterk|02-11-2017|Categories: Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Goodwill at end of franchise agreement

In a case before the Amsterdam Court of Appeal on 26 September 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:3900 (Seal & Go), a franchisee claimed compensation for goodwill (ex Article 7:308 of the Dutch Civil Code) after the

Go to Top