Forecasts and liability: sometimes look further
The regular visitor to this site will undoubtedly be aware that in franchise relationships the turnover and profit forecasts provided to the franchisee at the start of the franchise relationship are regularly the subject of dispute, in particular when these are not used by the franchisee in question. achieved. Particularly when the financing profile of the franchisee’s company is geared to those forecasts, failure to achieve the forecasted sales and results to a relevant extent can lead to difficult business situations, and in some cases even bankruptcies and the like. It is now settled case law that a franchisee can, under certain circumstances, hold his franchisor liable for the damage suffered by him as a result of this. In many cases, this is a one-on-one discussion between those directly involved in the conflict. In some cases, however, the franchisor himself has been misled when drawing up or assessing the offending forecasts. Of course, many franchisors themselves draw up their own forecasts based on empirical data. However, these are often drawn up by a market research agency or, for example, by a supplier of the services that are the subject of the franchise formula. It is then important for all parties involved to take this into account. Primarily for the franchisor, who may find in that third-party data supplier a possible lightning rod, to whom he can pursue his liability, for example through an indemnification procedure. This is also relevant for the franchisee. It often happens, especially in these times of crisis, that franchisors, especially when they are approached by several franchisees at the same time, do not survive a prognostic conflict. Pursuing liability can, under certain circumstances, mean the difference between bankruptcy or the continued existence of the organisation, and placing the liability where it belongs. It is therefore important for all those involved in these types of issues to thoroughly delve into the real and deeper causes of the problem, so that those who are really responsible are involved in the right way.
Mr DL van Dam – Franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Do you want to respond? Mail to info@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Article Franchiseplus: “Franchisors participate in franchisees” – dated June 3, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
Franchisors are increasingly participating in the franchisee's business. There are several benefits for both the franchisee and the franchisor.
Article The National Franchise Guide – “Corona discount on rent” – dated June 2, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
If a rental property is obliged to be closed due to corona, there may be a right to a rent reduction, according to the Northern Netherlands court.
Article Franchise+ – Franchisees enjoy the same protection as employees and commercial agents with regard to a non-competition clause – dated 7 May 2020 – mr. RCWL Albers
It often happens that, especially by franchisees, the validity of a post-contractual non-compete clause is considered too lightly.
The support agreement for the Retail sector in this Corona crisis – dated 15 April 2020 – mr. K. Bastian
On April 10, 2020, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, together with a number of landlords, retailers and banks, reached a support agreement.
Court rules that corona crisis does not constitute force majeure – dated April 10, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin
If payment cannot be made due to a decrease in income, then there is not always a force majeure situation.
Important information for directors of franchisees associations: Online meetings and decision-making in times of corona – dated April 10, 2020 – mr. J. Strong
Emergency law provisions for legally valid decisions without physically meeting within the association structure.