Entrepreneur and debt restructuring

In practice, franchisees, and sometimes also franchisors, have run into financial problems as a result of or because of the crisis. In a number of cases, the entrepreneur is advised to apply for debt restructuring. This contribution contains a brief explanation of the Natural Persons Remediation Act.

Any natural person with his own company – regardless of the nature and size of the company, the assets and the debts – can apply to the court for statutory debt restructuring, so in most cases also a franchisee.

The Natural Persons Restructuring Act (WSNP) offers the debtor the opportunity to put an end to long-term, or even lifelong, debts. A condition for admission to the WSNP is that the debtor has completed an amicable process. An amicable process is understood to mean a voluntary debt restructuring process. Only if the amicable attempt has failed can the debtor invoke statutory debt restructuring.

Debt restructuring is often a last resort to avoid bankruptcy. In many cases, debt restructuring involves a company, read in this case a franchise establishment, that is no longer viable and where the entrepreneur can be held personally liable in the event of bankruptcy. It is therefore the entrepreneur’s best interest not to go bankrupt. This can be a sole proprietorship, but also a general partnership, a legal form that is frequently used by franchisees.

The legal debt restructuring offers the entrepreneur the opportunity to get a “clean slate” in three years. This is not an easy process and there is also a good chance that the company will have to be terminated. The franchisee will have to make every effort to raise as much money as possible for the creditors. This will mean that everything that has any value must be converted into money. The proceeds can be used to make an offer to the joint creditors to pay part of the debt against final discharge. The franchisee can also be expected to become an employee in order to generate income to pay creditors.

Debts arising from fraud or a crime will constitute a ground for rejection for admission to the WSNP.

If the franchisee has been admitted to statutory debt restructuring, the court will appoint an administrator. During the statutory debt restructuring, a number of rules must be adhered to. If this is not complied with, the court can proceed to interim termination. The debt rescheduling will also end if an interim agreement is offered to the creditors or if all debts have been paid. The arrangement usually lasts three years, resulting in a clean slate; the remainder of the debts need no longer be paid.

The franchisee in financial difficulties must make the choice for himself between filing for his own bankruptcy, liquidation of the company in the WSNP or continuation of the company while retaining business assets in a moratorium. We can discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the above choices with you, so that you can make an informed choice.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Delivery stop by franchisor again not allowed”

Once again, the president in preliminary relief proceedings ruled on the question whether a franchisor's supply stop against the franchisee was permitted, with the franchisee paying a substantial

The manager (employee) who becomes a franchisee – fictitious employment?

On 14 December 2016, the subdistrict court judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2016:11031 (Employee/Espresso Lounge), considered the situation in which an employee

The Supreme Court sets strict requirements for franchise forecasts

A ruling by the Supreme Court on Friday casts a new light on the provision of profit and turnover forecasts to aspiring franchisees.

By Ludwig en van Dam|28-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017

On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the

By Alex Dolphijn|27-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Forecasts at startup franchise formula

The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the

Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?

On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation

Go to Top