Entrepreneur and debt restructuring

In practice, franchisees, and sometimes also franchisors, have run into financial problems as a result of or because of the crisis. In a number of cases, the entrepreneur is advised to apply for debt restructuring. This contribution contains a brief explanation of the Natural Persons Remediation Act.

Any natural person with his own company – regardless of the nature and size of the company, the assets and the debts – can apply to the court for statutory debt restructuring, so in most cases also a franchisee.

The Natural Persons Restructuring Act (WSNP) offers the debtor the opportunity to put an end to long-term, or even lifelong, debts. A condition for admission to the WSNP is that the debtor has completed an amicable process. An amicable process is understood to mean a voluntary debt restructuring process. Only if the amicable attempt has failed can the debtor invoke statutory debt restructuring.

Debt restructuring is often a last resort to avoid bankruptcy. In many cases, debt restructuring involves a company, read in this case a franchise establishment, that is no longer viable and where the entrepreneur can be held personally liable in the event of bankruptcy. It is therefore the entrepreneur’s best interest not to go bankrupt. This can be a sole proprietorship, but also a general partnership, a legal form that is frequently used by franchisees.

The legal debt restructuring offers the entrepreneur the opportunity to get a “clean slate” in three years. This is not an easy process and there is also a good chance that the company will have to be terminated. The franchisee will have to make every effort to raise as much money as possible for the creditors. This will mean that everything that has any value must be converted into money. The proceeds can be used to make an offer to the joint creditors to pay part of the debt against final discharge. The franchisee can also be expected to become an employee in order to generate income to pay creditors.

Debts arising from fraud or a crime will constitute a ground for rejection for admission to the WSNP.

If the franchisee has been admitted to statutory debt restructuring, the court will appoint an administrator. During the statutory debt restructuring, a number of rules must be adhered to. If this is not complied with, the court can proceed to interim termination. The debt rescheduling will also end if an interim agreement is offered to the creditors or if all debts have been paid. The arrangement usually lasts three years, resulting in a clean slate; the remainder of the debts need no longer be paid.

The franchisee in financial difficulties must make the choice for himself between filing for his own bankruptcy, liquidation of the company in the WSNP or continuation of the company while retaining business assets in a moratorium. We can discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the above choices with you, so that you can make an informed choice.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Director’s liability of a franchisee after failing to rely on an unsound prognosis.

On 11 July 2017, the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch made a decision on whether the franchisor could successfully sue the director of a BV for non-compliance with the

Liability accountant for prepared prognosis?

In a judgment of the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch of 11 July 2017, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2017:3153, it was discussed that franchisees accused the franchisor's accountant of being liable

How far does the bank’s duty of care extend?

Some time ago the question was raised in case law what the position of the bank is in the triangular relationship franchisor – bank – franchisee.

Burden of proof reversal in forecasting as misleading advertising?

In an interlocutory judgment of 15 June 2017, the District Court of Zeeland-West-Brabant, ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2017:3833, ruled on a claim for (among other things) suspension of the non-compete clause.

Fine for franchisor because aspiring franchisee is foreigner

On 5 July 2017, the Council of State, ECLI:NL:RVS:2017:1815, decided whether, in the case of (proposed) cooperation between a franchisor and a prospective franchisee, the franchisor

Article in Entrance: “Company name”

“I came up with a wonderful name for my catering company and incurred the necessary costs for this. Now there is another entrepreneur who is going to use almost the same one. Is that allowed?"

By Alex Dolphijn|01-07-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |
Go to Top