Entitlement to goodwill compensation for franchisee established – mr. AW Dolphijn – dated December 30, 2021

By Published On: 30-12-2021Categories: Statements & current affairs

On December 22, 2021, the District Court of Rotterdam ruled for the first time, as far as is known, that a franchisee is entitled to a goodwill compensation, as referred to in the Franchise Act. The ruling has not (yet) been published.

The Franchise Act stipulates that under certain circumstances a franchisee may be entitled to compensation for goodwill. See Article 7:920 paragraph 1 of the Dutch Civil Code. Although the Franchise Act stipulates that the franchise agreement must contain a goodwill arrangement no later than 1 January 2023, the court ruled that this already applies in the relevant case.

The franchise agreement regarding a service formula had ended after the agreed term had expired. The customer base belonged to the franchisee. However, just before the end of the franchise agreement, the franchisor had informed the franchisee’s customers that the services provided by the franchisor would be continued, that the franchisee’s staff would be taken over and that the entire service would therefore remain unchanged. The former franchisee was not compensated at all by the franchisor. The court deems this contrary to law. An expert will have to determine the size of the goodwill value, for which the franchisor must advance the costs of the expert’s report.

mr. A.W. Dolphijn
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl

Other messages

Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017

On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the

By Alex Dolphijn|27-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Forecasts at startup franchise formula

The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the

Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?

On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation

Transfer customer data to franchisor

In its judgment of 10 January 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:68 (OnlineAccountants.nl), the Amsterdam Court ruled, among other things, on the question of how customer data should be transferred.

Franchise Closing Sale – Who Gets the Sale Proceeds?

The judgment of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands dated 12 October 2016, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:5061 (Administrator/Expert Group and Rabobank), focused on the question whether the franchisor, together with the bank,

By Alex Dolphijn|10-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Judge: franchisor’s duty of care comparable to that of a bank”

Various judgments in 2016 made it clear how high the standard of care for a franchisor towards its franchisees is.

Go to Top