Entitlement to goodwill compensation for franchisee established – mr. AW Dolphijn – dated December 30, 2021
On December 22, 2021, the District Court of Rotterdam ruled for the first time, as far as is known, that a franchisee is entitled to a goodwill compensation, as referred to in the Franchise Act. The ruling has not (yet) been published.
The Franchise Act stipulates that under certain circumstances a franchisee may be entitled to compensation for goodwill. See Article 7:920 paragraph 1 of the Dutch Civil Code. Although the Franchise Act stipulates that the franchise agreement must contain a goodwill arrangement no later than 1 January 2023, the court ruled that this already applies in the relevant case.
The franchise agreement regarding a service formula had ended after the agreed term had expired. The customer base belonged to the franchisee. However, just before the end of the franchise agreement, the franchisor had informed the franchisee’s customers that the services provided by the franchisor would be continued, that the franchisee’s staff would be taken over and that the entire service would therefore remain unchanged. The former franchisee was not compensated at all by the franchisor. The court deems this contrary to law. An expert will have to determine the size of the goodwill value, for which the franchisor must advance the costs of the expert’s report.
Ludwig & Van Dam lawyers, franchise legal advice.
Do you want to respond? Then email to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Franchisee obliged to cooperate with formula change?
On 24 March 2017, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:1860, the preliminary relief judge of the Amsterdam District Court once again considered the issue in which Intertoys wishes to convert Bart Smit's stores
Delivery stop by franchisor not allowed
On 9 February 2017, the preliminary relief judge of the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:1372, ruled that a franchisor had not fulfilled its obligation to supply the franchisee
Alex Dolphijn in the Financial Dagblad about the judgment of the Supreme Court regarding Street-One
Franchisors more liable for incorrect forecasts Franchisees can now more easily hold their parent organization liable for incorrect profit and turnover forecasts.
Supermarket letter – 17
Supreme Court: More quickly liable for forecasts
Article in Entrance: “Small print”
“When I do business with a supplier, I never read the fine print. Recently I noticed that there are all kinds of things in it that I actually do not agree with.
Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Delivery stop by franchisor again not allowed”
Once again, the president in preliminary relief proceedings ruled on the question whether a franchisor's supply stop against the franchisee was permitted, with the franchisee paying a substantial