Clarity regarding financial obligations of franchisees

Franchisees generally have various long-term financial obligations towards the franchisor. This includes, for example, fee obligations, obligations with regard to contributions for advertising and promotion, rents in connection with possible subletting, as well as various other obligations such as (additional) financial obligations in the field of training, administration, additional marketing efforts, etc.

One of the most important principles of the European Code of Honor on Franchising is that it must be possible to deduce unambiguously from the franchise agreement how all financial obligations between franchisor and franchisee work together. This means that, for example, turnover-related sublease obligations must be integrated into the franchise agreement or must form part of the franchise agreement as an integral appendix. This may also relate to abruptly changing supplier credit, if the franchisor also has a wholesale function. Franchisees can suddenly find themselves in business difficulties as a result of such a change of course. By no means always does such an essential obligation – which does not take into account whether this last example has been agreed in advance – form part of the franchise agreement, or a very clear reference is missing, for example to general terms and conditions in which this is clearly and must be made transparent by the franchisor. After all, he is under the obligation, in accordance with the European Code of Honor on Franchising, to make essential financial obligations known in advance and, moreover, to record these in the franchise agreement.

Franchisees are therefore advised to assess all relevant documents (franchise agreement, sublease agreement, general terms and conditions, etc.) in advance when concluding the franchise agreement in order to prevent misunderstandings along the way. A good franchisor will of course proceed on its own initiative to explicitly indicate to the franchisees all essential financial obligations in advance. After all, he takes the European Code of Honor on Franchising as his starting point. If the franchisor is a member of the Dutch Franchise Association (NFV), he is also bound to do so at all times in accordance with the articles of association of the NFV.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Judge: Protect franchisee against supermarket organization (Coop) as lessor

Does the franchisee need legal protection from supermarket franchisor Coop? The District Court of Rotterdam ruled on 9 February 2018, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:1151, that this is the case.

Acquisition fraud vs. error in franchise forecasting

Who has to prove that the franchisor's forecast is unsound? In principle, this is the franchisee. If the franchisee invokes the Acquisition Fraud Act, it may be that

Obligation to sell back at the end of the franchise agreement

Franchise agreements sometimes provide that the franchisee is required to sell back purchased assets at the end of the franchise agreement.

Position of franchisees in franchisor restructuring

Franchisees must be adequately and generously informed in advance by the franchisor about the content and consequences of (further) agreements...

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal of burden of proof in forecasts approved by court” – February 2018

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam assists a franchisee in a

By Ludwig en van Dam|01-02-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |
Go to Top